By the time the NATO fighters are in a position to engage the enemy CAS jets they already have multiple Kh38s out, so you need AAs for that (which suprise suprise, almost no one wants to spawn first time).
For Helis it’s even worse, since it takes ages for NATO fighter to even reach said helis and a lot of AAs can’t actually touch the LDIRCM helis.
SO yeah, from actual experience playing top tier sim it’s almost definitely Russian CAS winning them games.
NATO CAS and Russia CAS are more or less equivalent, they all have FnF, jet CAS, GBUs, AGMs, …
90% winrate for Russia is not just a matter of “LMURs are better than AH-64E FnF missiles, so Russia wins every match”. It’s another reason.
NATO CAS and Russia CAS clash and destroy as many tanks as possible from one side to the other, but Russia resists more, destroys more, … and it’s not just because of their CAS…
It’s because it is methodically biased by the game
Once you actually play some top tier sim I’ll take something you say about it seriously.
It’s been the same for years. NATO MBTs beat Russian equivalents, Russian CAS just stomps the NATO MBTs.
So instead of proving me wrong, you just shift the whole argument…
The round didn’t actually pen.
I hit an overlapping plate somewhere and that bounced the round.
If this was T-90M people would be screeching Russian bias, but in reality I just screwed up a shot.
I’m not you with your pointlessly made up accusations
but it seems that t90m’s take up alot of “screwed up” shots
so called bais when they get spawn camp in 5 min matches
( if you cant understand with the video: matches are 24min and here you can see in the maps we are spawn camping them at 19min, so 5min in the gameplay)
The track, and track cover, are far more densely populated, and that leads to people hitting that armor more often, especially with the height they’re at.
People aim too high on T-series tanks, cause that’s how you frag Leopards and Abrams, but it’s not how you frag T-90s and ZTZs.
Aiming lower to hit those powder charges isn’t the going narrative on how to frag T-80BVMs.
All you need to do is search “drivers port/hatch” and you’ll see far, far more posts with that narrative than with aiming for ammunition.
I can count how many times I’ve hit the driver’s port on T-series tanks on 1 hand, and how many times I’ve aimed for the driver’s port on 1 finger.
And due to that, I’ve witnessed hundreds, maybe thousands of turrets fly.
Authority argument, you know I’m right, stop hiding the bias.
Everybody complain about russian bias at top tier except 3-4 white knights here, there is a reason. People are not paranoid.
there are 2 type of people who complain.
and there is you
unless you act like a smart person with good and real argument, no one is gonna listen to you
Read the rest of the posts russian bot
dont need cause i know all you says is nonesense. keep up the cope. unless you grew up. nothing is gonna change
Says the russian bot who never touched anything else than Russia and Germany at top tier. Laughable russian bot
I hope they nerf Russia into the ground someday, so you’ll suffer like the rest of us
russian already suffer if you didnt know and maybe used that thing inside your head.
only good thing about russian mbt ? armor
all other thing are bad
so unless you got something good to say. stop it
Russia (especially in top tier sim) is hard carried by their CAS, and it doesn’t take a genius to see that. Their MBTs are mediocre overall, and haven’t been the best part of their lineup since the BVM was added.
someone might not agree with you and will call you bot
I’m not arguing anymore, I showed 60 games in a row with a 80% winrate for Russia, further discussions is just coping at this point.
It’s plain and simple : in big 2k26, it’s either you struggle playing NATO nations, or play the game in tutorial mode with Russia. Take BMPT, BVM, MI-28NM, SU-30, stomp everyone, rush the points, win the games in 3 minutes. Or take the sad Abrams, get pened frontraly from the ring by APDS, get annihilated in your paper armor wheeled vehicles/other NATO MBTs.
It’s either you understand that, or you’re blind/deaf/biased and want to protect your kd hoping your favorite russian bias gets never nerfed. People see it, people know it, content creators do as well, people complain about it everywhere ingame, here, on Youtube and other medias. No need for further explications.
You are talking about top tier sim while your whole sim experience is a single game in the Tiger H1 (1 GAME!!!).
So yeah, call it whatever you want, but I’m not going to take anything you claim about top tier sim seriously.
Nope, I know you like to cope a lot, I know that you suffer from massive confirmation bias and I know that you are a pretty low impact player that has to get carried by teammates.
The latter is a perfectly fine explanation for your low winrate.
These are 6 games I played yesterday night, played my 12.0 UK lineup with all games being full uptiers to 13.0. First 3 games were all with Russia on my side, the last 3 games were all facing Russia.
So as you can conclude with basic math, of these 6 games Russia lost 5. Some more basic math makes that around a 16% winrate. Far fetch from the 70-80% winrates you keep claiming.
EDIT:
7th game: Russia on my side - Win - 2 wins out of 7 games for Russia
8th game: Facing Russia - Loss - 3 wins out of 8 games for Russia (small note: I left this game after 3 minutes/1 death because of the doorbell)
9th game: Facing Russia - Win - 3 wins out of 9 games for Russia
Well you are struggling with NATO nations for sure, a lot of actually good players not so much.
