I’m showing statistics.
Those 2 screenshots follow the 2 previous screenshots in the named thread, in which I was already explaining I was loosing 22 times in a row against 12.7 GRB Russia (the games where I was playing the SAMP/T only, I’m sure you remember this thread).
So I managed to evaluate a +/- 80% winrate for 12.7-13.0 GRB Russia over 60 games.
Is it paranoia ? Am I “coping” ? Am I being delusional ? Or is there a real bias out there ?
And if you actually read half of the replies on your post, you’d realise that its not bias, but a mixture of your poor teammates as well as your cherry picking of statistics.
What’s up with the artifacts?
I play on macbook
I feel sorry for you
why 😭 its not bad
I’m suprised you managed to get WT running on mac with it’s VERY limited support, hard to upgrade hardware post-purchase, etc. etc. But ig b. jobs from S. Jobs compensate for it
Its a Macbook Pro 2021 🙌
It works fine for me tbh but idk
Poor teammates over 60 games in a row ?
Cherry picking of statistics when showing +/- 48 losses over 60 games in a row ?
Do I have to respect the law of large numbers and play an infinite number of 13.0 GRB games against Russia to prove my point ? How many games do I actually have to show, with the related losses, to prove the point ?
Because I’m 165% sure I can continue like that forever. I can play 300 games, and Russia will still get a 70-100% winrate at 12.7-13.0 GRB.
The 60 games I showed were is nothing compared to the actual number of games against top tier Russia I lost. There is a pattern, a bias.
Again, read the replies to your post. I’m not going to repeat the obvious
I do not cherry pick, unfortunely. I wish.
It happens in EVERY 12.7-13.0 GRB games I play against Russia. The trend is that over 10, 20, 50, 100, 300 games played against them, losses is about 70-100% of the time.
Again, it’s not cherry picking, it’s just stats. I do not scroll in the game history, just picking the games that show a 80% winrate towards Russia. It just happens in every game
Like I said before, read the replies to your post, carefully.
They’re stating the obvious
Does the “pro” stand for “professionally rippped off”?
Nope, the obvious are the stats, showing the bias.
EVEN in urban games, where the map is extremely small and just a bunch of streets in a city, where I spend the whole game scouting with IR vision UAV and the WHOLE russian ennemy team is scouted, the allies loose.
When everybody is scouted, it gives the allies an extreme advantage, because they just have to point and shoot to kill. But again, the way russia armor is made on MBTs, I bet they see all the ennemies on the map, meet them in a corner, shoot, MISS (because the armor is rigged, bugged, biased), and die
It’s just factual
Master baiter, I’d loose my temper
Yea, I’m sure you haven’t wrote anything else to deserve that ban.
yeah probably
Nah i ragebait the ragebaiter
So, all you’re saying is your teammates are absolute braindead lemons?
Makes sense…
