It’s better than not being able to even see your target.
No it’s not, because you can actually see them using the 3 methods I talked about previously. You can also see them easily using 3rd person, so that’s 4 methods total.
I don’t think you have played or used the Su-25 at all. Even in the test drive you’ll realize how hard it is to hit a moving target without being able to lock it.
Same answer
Objectively false. SPO-15 can’t detect almost everything at it’s BR, unlike the A-10.
A-10A’s rwr is trash, it can’t detect everything and when it does it’s the wrong vehicle, I know that because I actually fly it
This will never happen in any match, as you will be much closer by the time the missile hits, while also being unable to dodge anything.
If you can’t use 0% speed + airbreak + fly straight instead of nose diving, it’s your problem. The missile will land when you reach 8km from target, if you shot 10km from target previously.
If you’re that scared of not hitting the targeted SPAA before reaching 8km distance away from it, you can even flood its radar shooting swarms of tiny rockets + chaff.
This isn’t true.
Yes, yes it is. Hence the fact there are way, way more players queuing for Russia at every top tier GRB BRs than for any other nation (even combined together).
Also, hence the fact every top tier GRB BRs are green for Russia, in terms of winrate.
The market (aka the large majority of WT player base) know what the META is, and just play it. They don’t waste time with inferior nations, they just want to win. So they pick Russia.
You won’t be 10km away by the time the missile hits.
Yes you will, see that response :
If you can’t use 0% speed + airbreak + fly straight instead of nose diving, it’s your problem. The missile will land when you reach 8km from target, if you shot 10km from target previously.
If you’re that scared of not hitting the targeted SPAA before reaching 8km distance away from it, you can even flood its radar shooting swarms of tiny rockets + chaff.
