You responding to me or Panther?
I simply said that the technology to make a mechanical system detect rough terrain and alter speeds of cycling is possible and in fact a thing on heavy plant/construction machinery. If nothing else there are sound engineering/mechanical stress reasons for it.
I just showed video where crew is blocked by steel plate from autoloader mechanism.
Desert Storm nightmares still rolls around I see.
Dark but funny joke.
This feature can also find on other NATO tanks and its main purpose is to decrease the chance of getting injure, its not hundred percent proof in case you dont know.
Standart japanese crewman is going to punch trough steel plate for some reason while autoloader is working ?
Buddy you do realize on rough terrain condition high speed movements not everything sits perfectly still and crew has to rotate in turret from time time right?
You’re picturing perfect conditions for crew members while in reality its far from that, not to mention you dont have to punch solid steel to injure yourself in 50 ton tank.
I should’ve specified early A-10s since the C has datalink. It should also be noted that late war axis aircraft would have stock crews due to the loss of veteran pilots.
I mean thats why they have steel plate there.
No its more like you sounding really wierd reason for autoloader to be lowered in speed like what is difference between 3 or 4 second for standart crewman.
I’m still amazed the fact that you nitpicked single part of my entire comment on why autoloaded tanks can reduce their ROF depending on condition while ignoring other facts.
Fine, lets assume Type-10 crew will be in perfect condition and has no chance to gettin injured and focus on loading mechanism, what do you think will happen when loading mechanism gets exposed to impacts during rough terrain that contains multiple bouncy zones? Thats right chances of getting jammed increases significantly.
There is a reason why engineers placed ROF mod for autoloadings tanks, unlike you they anticipates every single possible outcome and acts on them.
Anyway if you’re done I’d like to move on to next subject.
What’s this fact has to do with anything we debate on this thread? I’m kinda confused.
Response to the april fools joke but it was off topic anyway
Ah, i see.
My bad.
Is not
Do you have any source for your expert statements? Show me the “rate-of-fire switch” in the turret.
Since you’re so confident about your claims I’m pretty sure you can find the revelant information about this statement, don’t expect me to hold your hand like a 5 years old kid.
Third stage of denying, I see.
Same thing if it has 4 seconds reload like there is no point for slowering reload speed.
I see, have a nice day.
Not as incompetent as you when it comes to knowledge of tanks, especially on NATO ones.
Anyway if you’re done with your tantrums I suggest start looking for more documents.
Really what you think going to happend ? It will brake sound barrier, create vacuum and pull out crewman from hes seat just because of 1 second diffirence ?
You’re talking as if the real life simulates same perfect conditions that warthunder does, it does not.
In real life vehicles/crew do get affected by duration,terrain conditions and engagements while in warthunder vehicles/crew will always be at their peak condition.
Forcing autoloader or crew to perform at their peak condition constantly will result unpleasant outcomes but since you refuse to understand this part I see no reason to further this conversation.
He want to explode while still having a 5 sec realod.
