Moving current SM to 14.7 is pointless because SM2 already sits in there.
It will basically render SM pointless.
Yeah J-15T should be placed 14.3,especially after Pl-12 nerf.
Only if current top tier moves to 15.0-15.3 at least.
1 Like
Oh im absolutetly aware why Gaijin uses selective realism like that its just that i think using selective realism to balance the game in this way will lead to massive problems later on. And additionally if Gaijin is using selective realism as a standard balance measure then they could at least extend that courtesy to all tech trees and not just their favourite one.
Id also like for them to just play with an open hand and straight up say that they have to artificially buff russian equipment so its competetive just to see the rusmains cope and seethe.
1 Like
Why are you even so focused on the F-15C GE? I never implied the F-15C GE was worse you just brought that up out of no where
RU vehicles right now
5 Likes
I would say the only big russian bias we have right now is still the bmpt and the SPAA’s. Tunguska at 10.7 is still crazy. Same with S1 at 12.0
2 Likes
In my post I said the Su-30SM2 would be 15.0 and Su-30SM would be 14.7 (hypothetical decompression)
The gap would still to be too low.
SM2 should be at least 15.3 alongside with other top tiers if 14.3’s will be placed at 14.7.
1 Like
Pantsir S1 came out 3 years ago btw
Agreed, Rafale and EF-2000 (AESA) at 15.0 and the stronger 14.3 to 14.7
And the BR it’s at is still a joke
Both of them should also be 15.3 with missile adjustments.
1 Like
did I heard ᴹ ᴱ ᵀ ᴱ ᴼ ᴿ… or it must’ve been the wind
No comrade but here take another nerf to amraam
Xaxaxaxaxa ))))))))
So Tru, So Tru.
It needs a nerf.
Can you imagine, yesterday, when I was playing like normal, I saw an AMRAAM guide. GUIDE! Can you imagine? It started turning in the direction of the target.
Thankfully it was unable to pull hard enough, and it missed.
1 Like
Thats, thats… Heretic….
Thank god amraam found its way back to holy snail, god bless our holy snail.
1 Like
Well yeah ofc
This isn’t your reply to someone else:
Calling the Su-30SM a bit too strong for 14.3 and then saying this does imply that you think that the 15C GE is worse.
But I fully agree with Panthers post, none of the current 14.3s should move up as long as the current 14.7s stay at 14.7.
And the J-15T needs to be moved to 14.3
1 Like
Yes, it is.
It may also be better for the 16v16 matchmaker
My bad, the guy I was replying to singled out the F-15C GE needing to be at 14.7 if the Su-30SM also moved up to 14.7 which I meant to ask him why he even brought up the F-15C GE as a singular comparison and i did imply it was worse but never really said it myself more just asked him if he believed they were on par.
Honestly now that I think about it he’s probably right they are about on par although I would still edge the Su-30SM higher due to the R-77-1 being more versatile missiles at close and medium range though the F-15C GE is pretty good at BVR since AIM-120D is harder to defeat in notch and multipath
1 Like
Tunguska at 10.7 is really not crazy. The missiles have been SUPER easy to roll ever since they got their FM’s nuked. I can easily roll them in a fully loaded F-4E with a good 20m of fuel.
The lack of similar NATO AA is the only reason why Tunguska looks so favorable.
BMPT is also really not that crazy at 10.7 anymore.
Pantsirs can defo get nerfed either through BR or missiles though.