Still playing agenda thunder.
1 Like
Where’s your proof of French autoloaders being explosive
It’s not the autoloader itself which explodes , but the ammunition inside.
And as NATO ammunitions are put in place flat over 2-3 lines in the autoloaders (modeled like that ingame), there is no way the ammo don’t explode when hit from any angle from the front or back (not from the side thanks to the blow out pannel), because there are no holes in the autoloaders.
That’s the reason why NATO autoloader always explode while russian autoloaders don’t, because there are conveniently a lot of holes in those.
Also, NATO autoloaders don’t eat spalls as much as russian autoloaders do. The armor implemented in NATO autoloaders is very thin, while russian autoloaders are very strong, for some reason. No spalls means no explosion.
Also, when there are HEAT or HE shells in NATO blow out panels, there are more chance for the whole tank to explode, even from side shots. So it’s another artificial nerf for NATO.
Can you read ? :
It’s not the autoloader itself which explodes , but the ammunition inside.
And as NATO ammunitions are put in place flat over 2-3 lines in the autoloaders (modeled like that ingame), there is no way the ammo don’t explode when hit from any angle from the front or back (not from the side thanks to the blow out pannel), because there are no holes in the autoloaders.
That’s the reason why NATO autoloader always explode while russian autoloaders don’t, because there are conveniently a lot of holes in those.
Also, NATO autoloaders don’t eat spalls as much as russian autoloaders do. The armor implemented in NATO autoloaders is very thin, while russian autoloaders are very strong, for some reason. No spalls means no explosion.
Also, when there are HEAT or HE shells in NATO blow out panels, there are more chance for the whole tank to explode, even from side shots. So it’s another artificial nerf for NATO.
That is my thoughts. The whole “the autoloaders explode” are a sum up, the idea behind it is that if there are ammo inside, they should explode, russian or NATO autoloaders don’t mater. And most importantly, they should explode wherever the spalls go. No more bs ammo hitbox in favor of russian autoloaders.
Fun fact I’ve a better KD in my arietes at 11.7 than most my russian tanks.
Somehow russian bias.
The cas they get is strong af though.
And I have better K/D ratio in my T-80U-1E than my 12.7 Abrams but somehow its us bias.
See how stupid it is?
2 Likes
Talking about the MBTs the comparison is quite valid, ARiete is considered one of the worst in teh game if nto the worst , and they can and do have better KD than russian MBTs.
That’s my point. Their MBTs are not that good, at all: nothing stupid about the statement.
The russian Bias comes in when it comes to the ridiculous handholding of their CAS , new pantsir (old one shouldn’t be 12.0 either but here we are) and ofc the ridiculous addition of the BMPT.
Their MBTs are dogshit lol
Russian CAS is dumb af I agree, however other nations have more comparable CAS now too. (Israeli F-15 with like 24+ F&F munitions, Rafale for example)
New pantsir shouldn’t have been added but I’m sure we will find counters soon enough. (Brimstones are very effective surprisingly, I’ve noticed that myself from being forced to play SM in SQB and from fighting it in live matches as the euro)
BMPT is basically PUMA 2.0
People will eventually learn how to kill it (surely they will)
It can’t genuinely be killed like the Puma. You can overpressure Puma with anything that has HE in it, you can’t do that to a BMPT. It also doesn’t have the level of armor, so any frontal fight with anything that is an MBT is automatically lost, not for BMPTs, they’re not comparable in the slightest.
The 2A42 is also vastly better at incapacitating MBTs than the MK30-2/ABM due to fire-rate.
1 Like
The situation is the same
On addition PUMA was the first of its kind and ended up at too low of a br
Just like BMPT is the first of its kind in the game and also began at too low of a br.
You can also HE the BMPT’s turret to disable the FCS and cannon barrels/breeches
You managed that shot how many times?
You can also HE the BMPT’s turret to disable the FCS and cannon barrels/breeches
With a lucky shot… you kill Puma’s with 20mm HE ;)
You can easily recreate it in prot analysis
the kill shot unfortunately only works against the premium one which I don’t see as often
Then it means hitting it in a match is a 1 in a 1000 shot, not comparable to this happening to the Puma every second match:
1 Like
that’s a 30mm, not 20mm
And Abrams considered to be better than all Russian tanks but my T-80 stats shows otherwise.
Keep in mind premium t-80 sits at 12.0 and constantly gets dragged to 12.7-13.0 while my SEP variants sitting at higher br.
So its not valid when using cherry pick stats.
That’s strawman, the point is any amount of HE works and that Puma is vastly easier to kill than BMPT ever was, and will be.
This is just what i bothered to screenshot
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/e5kP56666PW6
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/GRu6JBYgBVut
1 Like
This is kind of a no-brainer, PUMA is a light tank.
Either way both were batshit insane on introduction. PUMA is dogshit now and the BMPT is also losing its presence now
I suggest read before type.
You obviously don’t understand the point of debate.