Says the guy who got trashed by multiple people on this forum due to its clueless claims.
You’re more than welcome to prove me wrong on Sukhoi case but my instincts tells me you cant cause you got no idea what’s going on.
3 Likes
" Despite these innovative technologies, the demonstrator plane was a failure. After all, the Su-37 crashed in 2002 following a critical software glitch."
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/russias-su-37-fighter-was-flying-terminator-reason-210739
Not sure what your obsession with the cobra is since i neither replied once to it nor do i care or know about it. But yes, pulling a cobra at 800kmh probably wrecks the airplane i could imagine.
You were saying Russian planes fall apart when pulling 9g+, which is what i responded to.
After i told you thats simply brainrot propaganda, you were moving the goalpost around and now try to dismiss everything because everybody but you is obviously mentaly inferior.
3 Likes
On the initial topic of the IRL G-limits on the flight models.
If the remover the x1.5 increase, m&k controlls will be “bricked” and this is not good for AAB/ARB.
If you’re going to share a document at least try to find better source.
“Su-37 crashed on 2002 due to structural failure on horizontal stabilizer during high G manevuer”
Not only you don’t know the actual reason why Terminator crashed you also posted a source that simply spreads misinformation.
Guess how many G’s does Sukhoi pull when it does cobra around that speed? Little hint its more than 9G’s.
Not really, you just can’t accept the fact despite their amazing agility Sukhois weren’t built to sustain those kind G’s in that kind of move which was the main point of the case.
I also specifically stated that this will happen if you activate AoA override but you completely ignored that part.
Such a poor attempt.
2 Likes
I am long enough on the forum to know this goes nowhere, so believe what you want to believe.
I prefer real life figures and facts rather than believing something which something you do occasionally.
Anyway have fun.
yeah which means like other similar systems not too good nto too bad it means it is balanced… but looking at how you respond im not surprised discussion with you is pointless
buk can’t even take out recon planes and takes half an hour to spin the radar once, you’re ragebaiting lol
oh and that means it sucks? you have a pantsir s-1 to compliment it and with that you have a nice AA bubble but looking at how you respond again i will repeat that you don’t know how to play the game and it comes from a guy who has negative kd but has been here since 2012 :)
so yeah need to carry he or hight explosive ammo for light tanks and spaas explain me wt hesh ammo is this no expode on impact…
I have no horse in this race and the Pantsir SM-SV shouldn’t have been added in it’s current form, but the buk is laughably bad.
Saying/implying that the BUK was anywhere close to the majority of the other AAs is equally laughable.
2 Likes
Cause it is and has fantasy unlock/relock capability
For me, the Buk is good because overall the missile is a good missile but two things that kill is how slow the radar spins compared to other radars and its size
2 Likes
They could’ve added better radar as an upgrade instead of adding completely new op system.
Tbf, there was not much of helping the BUK in that regard.
Tbf I still see far too many people not using launcher radars, but back on topic.
The only different search radar it could get would be as slow as the current one, and the launcher radar should be even slower than the search radar, while covering smaller area than it does now(current coverage is too big).
Even if that’s the case Gaijin could’ve look for different alternatives rather than adding pyshics law bender hypersonic missiles with new platform.
That is not something I’m going to deny.
The least they could do now is to bring the missile back to known physical limitation, if they don’t want to give it the usual Gaijin butchered model, but I have a feeling it is nowhere near a priority.
Its not because it suits them.
Right now nothing come close to SM-SV’s performance, not even IRIS-T and they intent to keep it that way for a while.