you’re showing people statistics in a way to spread misinformation, that’s not valid proof.
Not to mention making claims that are also designed to do the same thing, spread misinformation.
These are the winrates (March 2026), shown in an unbiased, clear way. Completely unlike the way you did.
You’re one of the most disgusting people to ever meet online. You lie, spread misinformation and fiddle with data to make your point seem more legit. You also ignore straight facts and evidence provided while failing to sometimes provide your own.
You are a deceitful, nasty person.
How is that different ? How am I misleading people and spreading misinformations ?
Can’t you see all the green in the russian column, starting from 10.0 GRB ?
What are you trying to prove exactly ?
Everyone is suffering in terms of winrates at top tier except Russia which is overly performing. What is your point ?
You’re one of the most disgusting people to ever meet online. You lie, spread misinformation and fiddle with data to make your point seem more legit. You also ignore straight facts and evidence provided while failing to sometimes provide your own.
You are a deceitful, nasty person.
You’re loosing your nerves because you’re loosing this argument and know I’m right. Very sad. For you.
I swear that somewhere in between 7.0 and 10.0 people completely lose the ability to aim for weakspots. If I were to call a Panther A or Jumbo undertiered I’d be made fun of, but if I said the same thing about Russian tanks, I’d have a worryingly large amount of people supporting me.
Apart from the BMPT BRs (10.7-11.3), they are no more than 4.5% above a 50% winrate. Regardless, winrate has too many factors that influence it, and it makes it an unreliable stat.
By that logic, 7.X France and 4.X USA are also over performing.
Why are you still arguing? 😭😭😭. I’ve read all of it. 😭 You ain’t winning ts. + You like to aim at the strongest parts available and then say “bro, my shell should have penned that! It’s only the strongest part of the tank!”
Apart from the BMPT BRs (10.7-11.3), they are no more than 4.5% above a 50% winrate. Regardless, winrate has too many factors that influence it, and it makes it an unreliable stat.
Again :
First : it’s not normal. It means Russia wins more often than NATO at top tier overall (btw see that 54.5% at 12.7 GRB ? It’s because of the BMPT + Pantsir 2 + artificially buffed top tier russian MBTs + LMURs and SU30s spams. Bet it’s even more at 13.0, too bad we can’t see it here).
Second : if Russia were always teamed up with China at top tier BRs instead of sometimes facing it, its winrates would be way higher (as proven by sim top tier winrates , where they’re both always teamed up, and get a 80% winrate in +/- every top tier brackets).
By that logic, 7.X France and 4.X USA are also over performing.
Yes. I’m not ashamed to say it. Idk about the USA, but 7.X France has some powerful and quick tanks at that BR, which can pen a lot. And it helps against russian vehicles.
So yes they are overperforming, but at that BR bracket only
There’s only one user commenting on people being upset over posts:
Funny how your posts constantly [rage] falsely accuse others with insulting accusations, and then your later posts are celebrating others being upset.
The most OP aircraft in the game has a 53.8% win rate in March:
The most OP tanks in the game have win rates between 46 and 48%: 12.7 MBTs sitting at 12.0 currently.
Which, conveniently enough, happen to all be russian. Funny isn’t it
EDIT : I’ll add something about that :
Chiming in with some addtional stats for ground:
russia also plays 47% of all games at 10.3
48% at 10.7
49% at 11.0
80% (lol) at 11.3
20% at 11.7
35% at 12.0
13% at 12.3
35% at 12.7 (more than the US and Germany combined)
Or in total
40% of all games played from 10.3-12.7.
So yeah seems like in high tier the game is in a truly great state rn
See how many games are played by Russia at top tier GRB ?
People know what the META is, so people play it widely. I tend to trust the majority of people in this game.
