Russian Bias in 2026?

I have done that plenty of time and every time it showed 50%.

No it doesn’t, you just make up fake spreadsheets managing the fake wins and losses so you get a perfect 50% every time, then show the said spreadsheets to me. Which isn’t really smart, because statistically speaking, it’s very unlikely you get a perfect 50% winrate for both sides everytime.

And you didn’t even show me the raw wins and losses with screenshots, aka what I used to do. Conclusion : you’re lying.

Beside, your personnal experiences don’t really mater at this point anymore :

Current March 2026 statistics as of today on Statshark (Ranks 7-9)
Russia holds a 50% or higher W/R from 9.7 to 12.7
The BMPT is sitting at a 60.1% W/R and the BMPT-72 is sitting at 59.5%
Both are ranked #2 and #3 (#1 and #2 if you discount the Gift T-80)
image



Peer vehicles sit well below the BMPTs in terms of W/R. Measuring from 10.7-11.7, the vehicles are as follows: (Measuring MBTs only)
#47 Ariete Certezza - 49.0%
#69 Ariete - 47.8%
#80 Ariete (P) - 46.7%
#85 Airete PSO - 46.5%
#87 Leopard 2A4 (Italy) - 46.4%
#91 Leopard 2A4 (France) - 46.2%
#95 ZTZ96B - 46.1%
#97 MSC - 46.0%
#102 Type 90 (B) - 45.6%
#104 Type 90 (B) “Fuji” - 45.5%
#106 Challenger 2 OES - 45.3%
#110 Al-Khalid-I - 45.1%
#112 Leopard 2A4NL - 45.1%
#114 M1A1 - 44.9%
#116 Type 90 - 44.9%
#119 Challenger 2 TES - 44.5%
#120 Challenger 2 - 44.4%
#123 Challenger 2 (2F) - 44.2%
#127 MBT-2000 - 43.9%
#137 ZTZ99-III - 43.3%
#143 IPM1 - 43.0%
#145 PT-16/T14 mod. - 43.0%
#147 ZTZ99-II - 42.3%
#149 T-80UD/BE - 42.2%
#154 Vickers Mk.7 - 41.9%
#160 Challenger DS - 41.6%
#172 Merkava Mk.3D (USA) - 41.0%
#177 Ra’am Sagol - 40.7%
#178 M1 KVT - 40.6%
#179 Leopard 2 (PzBtl 123) - 40.6%
#180 Christian II - 40.3%
#186 Challenger Mk.3 - 40.0%
#187 Leopard 2A4 - 39.7%
#189 Bhishma TWMP - 39.7%
#190 M1 Abrams - 39.6%
#194 Strv 121 - 39.2%
#196 T 80 U - 39.1%
#197 Merkava Mk.3C - 39.0%
#200 Leopard 2A4 (Finland) - 38.7%
#203 Merkava Mk.3B = 38.0%

We can now clearly see the current winrates for top tier GRB Russia are well above 50%. And let me tell you, they would AT LEAST gain 10% winrate overall for each top tier BR if they were fighting China + Germany, instead of being teamed up with them in some games (which bring the total Russia top tier winrates to around 60-70% → I wasn’t very far after all, with my personnal experiments).

Also, we can clearly see the 20 first top tier vehicles with the most important winrates are all russian. So there is clearly a pattern in the choice and performance results of the player base which tells us there is indeed a russian bias ingame.

We also got the other nations MBTs winrates as well, where we can see in the long list in the bottom of the quoted post than their winrates sit well below the russian MBTs winrates (for example : KVT → 40.6% vs T-80B → 58.4%), which once again tells us Russia is currently overdominant at top tier GRB right now, and thus that there is indeed a russian bias ingame.

1 Like


Now sort through kills per spawn
The first Russian tank that pops up is an SPAA, which is probably inflated due to killing scout drones

KS is more trustworthy than WR

Winrate is mega-influenced due to players one-death leaving

5 Likes

Nobody cares about kd, I’m solely talking about winrates.

I want to play a game where I can win and not loose 80% of the games, I do not care about personnal performances.

It’s not my point.

All the stuff in said spreadhsheets is real, I even added the replay links.

But like I said, it doesn’t fit your pre decided narrative so instead of accepting that you just accuse me of lying.

Again, it’s only unlikely becuase of you live in your own reality, also you can’t really comprehend people actually being good at the game.

1 Like

Nobody does care about KD, I’m talking about KS

KS is significantly more relevant compared to WR,
image
Why? Just look at Germany, they have one of THE best 6.7 lineups in the game, yet their winrate is complete garbage.

WR is easily farmed and influenced by people one-death leaving as well as people playing in squads.

There’s a reason why skilled players focus on KS over wr for ground RB

Also, you haven’t made a comment regarding my video yet, I would like to hear your thoughts

5 Likes

It literally isn’t proxy, there is no proximity fuze.

You didn’t read my very long post, did you ?

It doesn’t mater if it is or isn’t a proxy fuze, the result is literally the same, as explained in the post.

Stop calling it proxy fuze
The result is not the same, with time fuze you have to get the range of the target first, with proxy you don’t. Makes it significantly easier to hit snapshots and is better for dealing damage against moving enemies as well as shooting down munitions

1 Like

My shot wasn’t volumetric, it didn’t hit a track, it hit a flat hull surface, covered by an ERA.

90 degrees shot, 15 meters shot, it wasn’t about a volumetric problem.

It’s just articially buffed russian bias.

which shot?
you’re just pulling stuff out of thin air here

1 Like

First : you’re lying about your results.

Second : you didn’t even comment about the long quoted post I added below my first comment, which is interesting.

prove that he’s lying

2 Likes

You take a stat and add some random percentage(s) that you pulled out of your *ss.

1 Like

I do not care about your comments on the whys and wherefores the winrates are bad for X Y or Z reason, so it’s just better to consider KS or KD or whatever.

Bottom line : NATO winrates are bad, meaning Russia wins more often than NATO, meaning there is a russian bias ingame (aka : NATO is currently treated, somehow, so it looses majority of games at top tier GRB).

Stop coping

I’m deducing by your post you literally didn’t read mine, so I’m gonna repost it so you can read it this time :

It’s literally the same result for both if you use them with IRST, which the T90M has.

A trigger or a set time fuze will literally destroy a hovering helicopter the same way while using IRST, for a MBT shooting the shell.

It will also destroy a low flying jet locked with IRST as well, unless it goes SO FAST the distance between the air zone where the APFSDS is supposed to be shot and the actual position of the jet when the APFSDS finaly arrives is so important that the fuze doesn’t make any damage to the jet (in other words : never).

Concerning the T-80UK and T-80U-E1, they don’t have IRST so destroying a low flying jet can be difficult, but they can still use their rangefinder to easily destroy a hovering helicopter. So yes, their proxy he is still useful to them.

And you somehow still tried to use this “it’s not really a proxy he” argument to discredit me, you dishonest squirrel.

Do you understand Russia getting a proxy fuze or not proxy fuze doesn’t change anything ?

Oh no its not, thats like saying puma ahead or ctas hetf is just as good as bofors hevt on m247 or cv9040

1 Like

This shot :

3 days ago, I shot a BVM side ERA at 90 degrees angle from 15 meters, and it literally ate my 576mm of pen french APFSDS.

As I already stated it. Italy map, this post followed it right after the game : Russian Bias in 2026? - #3035 by SadRIPer

Easily checkable in the official replays with the timestamp

So all of this is false, is that what you’re saying right now ? Interesting

It literally just means Russia wins more often, Despite MANY NATO vehicles being incredibly superior to what Russia has to offer.

Simply look at the KD and KS of NATO vs Russian tanks, NATO vehicles are significantly better in that aspect, WR is really irrelevant for the reason I stated earlier.

1 Like

Trust me it is, the tnt explosive mass is just too much to compare it to those 2

They’re still vastly different,

Exactly like here.
Proxy munitions vs Time fuze are completely different in how they work and their capability.

Time fuze requires setup to work, not to mention only works for a set range. That means you can’t just snapshot it or shoot munitions down.

1 Like