I’m deducing by your post you literally didn’t read mine, so I’m gonna repost it so you can read it this time :
It’s literally the same result for both if you use them with IRST, which the T90M has.
A trigger or a set time fuze will literally destroy a hovering helicopter the same way while using IRST, for a MBT shooting the shell.
It will also destroy a low flying jet locked with IRST as well, unless it goes SO FAST the distance between the air zone where the APFSDS is supposed to be shot and the actual position of the jet when the APFSDS finaly arrives is so important that the fuze doesn’t make any damage to the jet (in other words : never).
Concerning the T-80UK and T-80U-E1, they don’t have IRST so destroying a low flying jet can be difficult, but they can still use their rangefinder to easily destroy a hovering helicopter. So yes, their proxy he is still useful to them.
And you somehow still tried to use this “it’s not really a proxy he” argument to discredit me, you dishonest squirrel.
Do you understand Russia getting a proxy fuze or not proxy fuze doesn’t change anything ?
It literally just means Russia wins more often, Despite MANY NATO vehicles being incredibly superior to what Russia has to offer.
Simply look at the KD and KS of NATO vs Russian tanks, NATO vehicles are significantly better in that aspect, WR is really irrelevant for the reason I stated earlier.
Russia doesn’t win more often than NATO out of thin air.
The majority of western players playing a NATO nation are not complete braindead idiots if that’s what you’re implying.
If Russia wins largely more than NATO, it’s for a reason (like artificial / shadow buffs regarding russian vehicles, for example). It’s called a bias towards Russia.
@SadRIPer
Me: Defends NATO vehicles
“Stop defending Russia!”
Ah yes, cause Russia is NATO?
You showed videos that showcase roof armor, tracks, overlapping plates, and server issues causing problems; traits that are universal and impact all tank engagements without exception.
None of those videos showed ERA eating MBT APFSDS [or even HSTVL’s APFSDS for that matter, even if it should at high angles]. That is not an opinion, that is a repeating of the content of those videos, a summary.
So stop falsely accusing others of things. It wasn’t funny when I incorrectly did it in 2023 [as an incorrect method to get clarifications from people], and it’s not funny when others do it.
This is a completely moronic argument, ofc the vehicles with the highest wr here are Russian, it’s almost like Russia has the highest wr rn and those vehicles all sit in the same lineup.
You’re taking the combined average winrate of all those vehicles and then separating it, making it look worse than it really is.
This is a completely moronic argument, ofc the vehicles with the highest wr here are Russian, it’s almost like Russia has the highest wr rn and those vehicles all sit in the same lineup.
So Russia wins large majority of the games, thank you for this confession. Thus there is a bias ingame.
you’re showing people statistics in a way to spread misinformation, that’s not valid proof.
Not to mention making claims that are also designed to do the same thing, spread misinformation.
These are the winrates (March 2026), shown in an unbiased, clear way. Completely unlike the way you did.
You’re one of the most disgusting people to ever meet online. You lie, spread misinformation and fiddle with data to make your point seem more legit. You also ignore straight facts and evidence provided while failing to sometimes provide your own.
You are a deceitful, nasty person.
