i dont know why you are so hell bent on this one specific scenario, but there is a lot more to grb than trading shots with heavy tanks from a long distance
i mean… the gun depression (which the is4 doesn’t have) lets the t32 hide its only weakspot and lets it completely null your entire 1km argument
it also lets it completely steamroll anything it faces from a hulldown position since its turret armor is so strong it can reliably tank even some heatfs rounds
@An_Pigeon i hate to break it to you but russians dont actually find the word “russki” offensive at all since its literally means “russian” (the russian word is русский)
But he constantly shows me a perfect 50% winrate in his games, I find that hard to believe.
It’s never exactly 50%, in so few games. If the game were perfectly balanced (which it is not), the theoretical winrate for all nations would be 50%, but after lots and lots of games played, according to the law of large numbers.
Very unlikely you always get 50% winrate in such small samples, every time. It would more likely look like 61.32%, 42.1123%, 63.01% 58.745893% 47% etc. It sounds sus af.
The excel screenshot I also attached shows which games were against Russia and which were teamed up with Russia. If you want to verify it by going through the replays yourself, but the screenshot with the info is right there.
I won 8 games against Russia and I lost 7 games against Russia.
Well what you believe is up to you, but I’m not lying.
I have nothing to gain and I honestly don’t care enough about half of the supposed Russian bias stuff here to lie for it. You living in your semi fantasy/conspiracy world has no direct impact on me. Since I’ll likely just close this tab in a little bit (ADHD moment) to go vibe in a VC with friends and my life will go on as normal no matter what you believe.
does not matter it is He vs HEAT warhead… gues which one suffers from that locking rng?
No I never ignored that but they were quickly fixed… now compare it to years of ka-50 domination etc etc… and now what we have :)
yes you used it against me as well and you don’t see me crying about it LOL
yeah and? do we all have to be good? no. That is why we don’t have SBMM which I would love to have…
the majority is a mediocre player base.
Thank you. Just like a lot of people use Polacks which in English is offensive which we don’t find it to be because we use the word on a daily basis…
I am finishing this discussiion with you Pigeon you are too blind to see hundreads of post now of people complaining but you say that it is not you use a counterargument that something nato had was op but you never consider that some stuff was nerfed fast while russians have bmpt for a while now and it is still overpowered.
I find common ground with you for some cases but come on “i support removing the kh-38mt or lmur flightpath” it will never happen… why can’t you just admit the game favors Russians giving them longer time with op stuff… giving them more and more op vehicles while other nations which are in dire need of such don’t ?
To be fair? I have a massive russian premium lineup just because I know they are too strong and even with bad stats I can earn 140k per battle of SL doing mediocre style gameplay
show me a lineup which is comparable to it’s effectiveness… Guess what I take su-30mkk with bmpt t71 turms 2s38 su-39 and t-80ue1 most op lineup there is of premiums in a RUSSIAN tech tree for grinding…
the us? cool but it lacks the CAS loadout the russians have… making the russians have a slight advantage and taking into consideration how russians ussually end up spawn camping other teams…
Can’t do that in Germany/UK/Japan/china<— well kinda with their su-30 /italy/france/sweden/israel
Your cross analysis is a bit flawed. Bmpt does not have 9.3 offensive capabilities. Sure the bmpt has the same gun as the bmp, but paired with 2 cannons and multiple high pen missiles with great mobility and armor, there is no point in saying that statement.
