New one for ya !!!
Every wipe out match against russia - look at the players GARAUNTEED at least 2 people have bought the Turms 3 tank!
Seriously check it! Its like a magnet to pizz easy matches.!
everyone who says there is no russian bias, go on, play NATO in top tier simulator ground forces… if you still dont see the problem, then YOU ARE THE PROBLEM
It’s almost like Russia’s single win condition, CAS and AA, is even more powerful in Sim.
2 Likes
Turret baskets, it has been months since this has been implemented as it stands every top tier tanks excluding ones of Russian/Chinese lineage do not have Turret baskets.
The definition of biased.
1 Like
T-34 Driver hatch.
Everyone’s penetration is worse, while KV-1s, when angled slightly, become nearly impossible to kill, especially if they are the KV-1E or B variants. In a match, 4 different, maybe more, KV-1s are running us over because none of our guns, not even a 76, can penetrate them, despite historically being able to.
You can also include KV-1C.
Never stop saying this: I wish we could put all whiners in pre-basket era but they can play only russian/Chinese MBT so they could taste how fair is when NATO MBTs that supposed to be less armored with payoff of having better stats were surviving actually more and than shooting back onetapping Russian/chinese mbts. It’s like there a reason why NATO got basket and Russian/chinese autoloader
Average pre basket era exchange between NATO MBT and Russian/chinese
In case if you missed great example how it was back then
1 Like
Yeah the reason is that we have to artificially make up for bad tank design, because otherwise chine and russia players would constantly cry even more about how bad their tanks are. Of course that doesn’t apply to bad western tank designs, those just stay bad.
Like I try to understand if it even worth to reply meaningfully to this cringe
Lmao cringe. Its just the truth. Bluefor would mop the floor with Redfor every single game if Gaijin didn’t employ the occasional selective realism to make some equipment less shit than it would be otherwise. The baskets are one example of that
T-54 8.0 1949
Leopard 1 8.0 1965
M60 8.0 1959
Vickers mk 1 8.0 1963
DF105 8.0 1979
AMX-30 (1972) 8.0
Should I continue?
Those are BRs. What does that have to do with Gaijin making stuff up so russian equipment is less garbage?
Redfor vehicles are garbage but it’s NATO that’s need BR pandering to fight much older redfor to make it balanced. Because otherwise T-64 and T-72 would wipe into floor leopards, m60 and other non stabilized nato trash
You can make the same argument for German ww2 vehicles that constantly face post war stuff. That’s how the br system works.
But it’s like I said: nato trash stays trash while Russian trash gets some questionable or straight up fake stuff so they can larp being competitive
No, all NATO tanks are viable. That’s just you being trash.
One is changed warfare that goes the same for late Soviet WW2 vehicles. Another is Bluefor sucking up like for 2/3 of cold war period only catching up in 80 with Abrams and 2A4. Those are not the same
No my duded, hypersonic missile is fraction of an issue with SM SV.
Issue with SM SV is the entire package: moderate size (as for SPAA), amazing mobility, self-defense capability against ground targets, self defense tools (smokes) that allow to basically ignore incoming IR homing missiles, complete vertical radar coverage with no blind spots, guns(again) to deal with heli rush/close flying targets (vast majority of multi-vehicle SAM systems have minimal engage distance that can be abused), and the start of the show - TKG missile.
With all this package you don’t even need hypersonic missile to completely negate anything CAS will throw at you/your general direction.
1 Like
They don’t get artificial boons like russian trash does, that’s the point.
Ok? That’s still just how the BR system works lol.
Me not playing the ussr doesn’t make any difference to the simple truth that especially Russia gets a ton of artificial, selectively realistic buffs to make some equipment better that it should be.
They don’t but they are still better. Russian tanks only rely on occasional bullshit survivability, but if your survivability is being tested it means you made a mistake and initiative was on enemy’s side. Survivability won’t kill people for you, it won’t reload faster for you, it won’t allow you to depress gun lower when you need it, it won’t get you in the places fast.
Also after the recent Abrams armor rework + turrest basket addition all NATO tanks received a noticible boost in survivability.
4 Likes
True but they still don’t get the same treatment which is clearly some sort of preferential treatment for Russia. No matter the outcome
Yes, I totally believe loader gonna load 20 120 mm darts every 5 second while driving at 60+ while tank jumps like crazy upside down
But the reasoning is different. You called redfor vehicles trash when for 2/3 of game is just wrong. Thats why redfor have to fight aliens from future.
Ok. Lets revert every buff. In that case T-80BVM 10.7 when?
1 Like