T58 along with BMPT are meta but one is russian and one isnt so tell me is that bais?
This forum hosted not one but a few T58 defend threads when it was down at 8.3 lol.
its 8.7 now and faces APS and good rounds but still can perform BMPT also got a nerf to long range
also have you guys ever checked Alvis sessions his most recent one he was using mig21 which I have not issue with mig21 but he spent 6 months defending Russian bais not existing yet he uses Russian vehicles (I have no issue with that) but guys I think its time to accept your skill issues
gg, see y’all in 2027(work on skill issue)
Because some need it more than others.
You’re still not getting it. The gameplay impact is whatever the buff is. The problems are behind that. How do you bug report a completely made up buff ? And more importantly where is the limit? Can Gernany demand a fake ldircm for the uht because Russia gets fake missiles? The technical compatibility rule allows for balance without creating these problems.
Dude… that’s a mass restriction, not a weapon restriction.
It only proves the point within my posts that if store positions are wired for AGMs that AGMs can go there.
Do you actually know that it’s a mass restriction? No you don’t. You guessed. That’s why actual proof is so important and conveniently ignored the Eurofighter example. And the same question would apply for example spikes on the inner wing station of the Uht. They are AGMs and the French tiger can carry them so why doesn’t the German one get any and vice versa?
Cause I don’t have knowledge of the Typhoon’s wiring system & memorization of store positions.
My stance remains identical though: If there is error it should be alleviated; however Typhoon will not change the rule if it is an exception.
Your last question is a false equivalence fallacy.
We’ve been talking about singular examples this entire time, not different examples.
France & Germany have unique nonsense with their specific Tiger variants that have been proven in documents, the same proof your post claimed was proving a negative & isn’t needed.
Maybe get to top tier before voicing your opinion on the matter ?
And I won’t dive into the “skill issue” part for obvious reasons
There is no error as per the sources we have. That’s my point. For the efts loadout to change we’d need proof that the different pylons can carry these weapons. For the Mi28NM this apparently doesn’t apply. There is no mistake, just a double standard where every vehicle needs specific proof for every weapon and every pylon but the mi28nm (and the su30sms to a certain degree) just get it on assumption.
It’s the same situation. The respective Tigers get the Spike or Pars due to what we have sources for not based on a simple assumption that pylons are interchangeable regarding weapons of the same class.
You must be eating good against all those people buying into nerfed BMPT.
You can still get it to triple fire and have all 3 track correctly even after the patch. Did it last night at the end of a game.
Not even that many more BMPTs than usual, just a lot of T-series MBTs.
However I do see a lot of Su-30s just mega throwing by bringing full ARM loadouts.
So people trying out ARMs turned one of the best tools RU has into a nearly useless SP waste, leaving T-tanks to be farmed. Nothing much to see there.
It’s just funny. They’ll have 2-3 Su-30s up all with full ARM loadouts and after 1-3 AA deaths in total my US teams just say “Would be a shame if we just spawned tanks and murdered your team while you can only watch helplessly”.
It doesn’t help that many people don’t even understand what version of the ARM to bring against what radar band. Only a 33.3% chance you loaded the right one if you don’t know which one you need. The U.S has it lot easier with their ARM’s being over a much wider frequency
You’d have way more threads about it if it weren’t that way
Yeah, things there can switch really easily.
Can’t even imagine the slaughter-fest that’s going around the 11.7 now, with people playing the BMPT in a recommended, “just hold W”, play style.
