No?
How are you having issues with Bismark, they are easily one shot by everything.
Soyuz followed by Iowa but only if the Iowa remembered to run 50% ammo. Otherwise they are just as easy to kill as the Bismarks.
Soyuz could quite easily be 9.7, Iowa, 9.0. Everything else is correctly placed.
You dont have to tell me, you have to convince Gaijin. Because well… Its russian and its Gaijin…
I’m not having issues with Soyuz or Bismark as I learned their rather similar weakspots.
Gaijin already knows Su-57’s radar cross section is similar to Rafale, they don’t need to be told otherwise.
You want to bet on that?
I’d also like to expand on this in regard to bug reporting/fair implementation.
As it stands, bug reports/fixed bug reports are purely up to whatever gaijin/the mods think, and the rules around them make accurately reporting vehicle issues much more difficult for anyone but Russia or whatever vehicle gaijin wants to buff.
For implementations, I feel that gaijin just adds whatever they think will make their “statistics” be the “best”. See the Rafale vs EFT, where they buffed the Rafale unfairly above everything else. Then there’s also the J-10C vs Su-30SM2 implementation where one gets powerful engines it has barely used, and the other is stuck with weaker ones that it used to use.
Is it malice? I don’t know. Is it incompetence? Probably. The QnA showed how out of touch BVVD is, and I don’t think they will deliberately make themselves look bad. They also don’t seem to play their game, or atleast have an idea on what it’s like as evidenced by the BR changes and such.
Edit: Somewhere between 6.7 and 10.0 players seemingly forget how to aim for weakspots, which leads to a lot more RU bias accusations for tanks than there should be. Theres also so many internal biases against Russian vehicles in the playerbase, to the point where it’s difficult to objectively discuss things.
Its gonna happen somehow buddy.
Man im so not looking forward to the inevitable F22 vs SU57 meltdown in this forum once the 5th gen update comes
Me in my typhoon with my metoers not worrying since I don’t have stealth
f22 win easy
thats a lie
“Allegedly”. Its like saying you have a TV but you only own a 480p tv. It counts, but no one wants to watch the game on it.
I guarantee that if the Su-57 comes and isn’t weak, there will be meltdowns for days because Russia gets something on par with western equipment.
Yeah, but this is Gaijin.
Allegedly is enough for soviet reports. Its why KH-38MT exists.
dont worry i will be your mini bomber in my su34 spaming my 5 kh59m cruise missiles and air to ground kh31
The problem is they dont care about actually understanding the tech. The cute “Cheek Radars” on the Su-57 are the perfect match for the analagy i referenced. Those sensors have 1/3 the density needed to get a target lock on anything much less a stealth aircraft outside of maybe sub 5km.
I fear gaijin is gonna treat them just like a full fidelity radar and let the jet lock shit from absurd angles that are not only unrealistic but outright overpowered. If it comes to that it will make gaijin look delusional.
Really depends on why its strong if its just agile due to thrust vectoring and has good missles people wont be that upset but if its stealth is better than the F22 or its DIRCM works perfectly against 5th gen missiles then people will riot lol
side radar are capable of 150-200 km DL, same with the rear radar.
its the stupid wing radar that have like 30km range
On a B-29 maybe lmfao.
its 400km for b52 size. maybe 250 sides
F-22 fanboys inbound, and Su-57 fanboys inbound.
Me knowing the F-22 is over-rated ready to fly the plane anyway. :)
Not true but you can continue in your delusions if you must. Not risking my clearance to explain.
If you take those numbers in a vaccum as the theoretical optimal then sure, but the real deal is going to be dramatically differnt. Zero chance it would be able to lock a stealth fighter in proper aspect outside of 24km and you can confirm that with basic RF math calcs.