Same as how you counter other LDIRCM helicopters.
3 Likes
You can’t unless you’re using Radar guided SAM system (which is not hundred percent effective) or CAP.
1 Like
i actually haven’t
You still need to find the right site lol.
4 Likes
Those 700 games over the last month in the Puma VJTF should be a good hind I hope.
No way that a major nation vehicle is only played for 700 battles over a whole month.
5 Likes
because 70-80% playerbase play russia…?
and please send me the “right site” if you know all…
Your playrate is still off by a factor of ~1000 lol
And the site you want to use is statshark, its not perfect but by far the best we have
7 Likes
Nope, because thunderskill uses a flawed dataset.
As H_ngma already said perfectly. While statshark isn’t perfect, it’s miles better than thunderskill.
2 Likes
They go straight through without doing any damage xd
Thunderskill is so bad it thinks I have a 12K/D. Complete joke of a site now that statshark exists
3 Likes
this is most funny part…(i give you that you have absolutely no experience in SB) so top tier GB sim is dominated by russian cas but NATO have better SPAA…unless it doesn’t.If it have had, there would be no russian CAS dominance. Mi 28 is basically immune to anything other than saclos and KH38MT is so fast and in such quantity you are either shooting down multiple salvos of missiles which he safely restock in about 1 minute or risk trading SPAA spawn for one enemy plane. And lets not get bogged down how russian cas is handled like KA 50 + tunguska vs no comparable SPAA, KH38 with pantsir without any counterpart and both these “periods” lasted for over 1-2 years. Stop pretending you are objective. You are not just like Alvis…
You are pretty much repeating what I said a couple of posts later in this thread:
NATO AAs are absolutely better than Russian AA, but that doesn’t stop Russian CAS from winning games.
Ironic that I’m supposedly not objective, when I barely play Russian vehicles at all. Besides the Su-30MK2 for grinding in air RB, I have played a whole 1 battle in any Russian ground vehicle (IS-7) over the last month. If anything that means I should be biased against Russia following your own logic.
2 Likes
Depends on which AA’s you’re talking about.
I was generally talking about top tier in that post (at least iirc, it’s been a couple of days). Overall it’s a mixed bag, because no way will I ever rank the Spyder or EldE (if we group Israel with NATO for a bit) over anything, the SLM and maybe the SAMP-T definitely seem way more flexible than the BUK at the moment.
2 Likes
Russian bias only exist in ground. Their air top tier is just cooked. The SU-30SM has no chance against the 14.3+ planes.
SLM’s biggest flex is not bein effected by multipath and notch.
Meanwhile BUK’s missiles has insane range,speed and warhead which makes it pretty much best ARH platform at top tier in my eyes.
Someone forgot that Super Hornet shares the same br while having even worse flight performance than base Su30SM.
Also Russia just recieved Su30SM2 which is one of the best top tier jet right now.
What mean bias ? WT is made to promote only one nation. Su30, BMPT, Kontakt-5, LMUR … :)