You are pretty much repeating what I said a couple of posts later in this thread:
NATO AAs are absolutely better than Russian AA, but that doesn’t stop Russian CAS from winning games.
Ironic that I’m supposedly not objective, when I barely play Russian vehicles at all. Besides the Su-30MK2 for grinding in air RB, I have played a whole 1 battle in any Russian ground vehicle (IS-7) over the last month. If anything that means I should be biased against Russia following your own logic.
I was generally talking about top tier in that post (at least iirc, it’s been a couple of days). Overall it’s a mixed bag, because no way will I ever rank the Spyder or EldE (if we group Israel with NATO for a bit) over anything, the SLM and maybe the SAMP-T definitely seem way more flexible than the BUK at the moment.
No, because if the problem were with a single vehicle, I might complain about that vehicle. But the problem is that the entire nation is “OP” in the War Thunder setting.
Hmm, i wouldn’t call the entire USSR techtree ‘OP’ because thats a stretch at the least. Well balanced might be a (somewhat inaccurate) term to describe it, but OP? Certaintly not.
I’ll just continue to casually play and enjoy my favourite vehicles, which are all NATO side btw, while your reddit level conspiracy theory believing ass will just continue to cope and seeth.
I know which one of us will have a more pleasant time.
Also employee, lmao I wish I was getting paid to troll people like you online.