Nope, the obvious are the stats, showing the bias.
EVEN in urban games, where the map is extremely small and just a bunch of streets in a city, where I spend the whole game scouting with IR vision UAV and the WHOLE russian ennemy team is scouted, the allies loose.
When everybody is scouted, it gives the allies an extreme advantage, because they just have to point and shoot to kill. But again, the way russia armor is made on MBTs, I bet they see all the ennemies on the map, meet them in a corner, shoot, MISS (because the armor is rigged, bugged, biased), and die
You are that sure because you are looking for proof to confirm your already established belief, not because you are actually looking for what is going on.
If you believe there are more blue cars than red cars driving around in my area, of course you will subconsciously notice or look for the blue cars more than the red cars (just a random example).
EDIT: This was the game I mentioned in the other thread from Friday:
It was a win, but because I was in a 4 stack that isn’t the important part. This was me playing 13.0 France (well I only got to use the Leo 2A6NL and Leclerc SXXI, but you get the point), it was against Russia and I played like an absolute idiot (if you don’t believe me, watch the replay).
There is no point in discussing bias, one side will use wrong or false examples and other will ignore actual examples and focus on those that are easily debunked. I won’t say which side is which.
Yep, and the losing streak that SadRIPer posted also means very little, because his overall winrate for the the Leclerc is still 47% and his winrate in the Leclerc over the last 3 days is still 45.5%, which are both a far fetch from Russia having a 70-80% winrate like he claimed.
I’ll try to get some more games in (if the matchmaker decides it wants to do something), doubt it will be any different from the game I had on Friday though.
That is the funny thing, since those “actual examples” are very much subjective so what you describe here applies to both sides at the same time.
And that is exactly the problem with the whole Russian bias discussion. There are very little objective examples for either side, because who gets to decide which examples are objective or subjective?
The examples that are closest to being objective are the BMPT release, Kh38MT and Mi-28NM. Everything else is mostly subjective, especially the ones involving Russian MBTs.
when a company has done stuff like more hp on russian gun barrels, wood log with the same properties as rha or the extra plate mantlet on is6, do you rly expect me to believe they wont try different aproaches to make the russians have an edge?
how long as era been broken? it benefits everyone, but what nation plasters it all over the tank?
its the same with regenerative driving, but russian tanks dont need it so… tough luck
I have a 45% winrate with the Leclerc, and not 20-25%, because winning along with Russia counts in the winrate %.
If they counted only the winrate without Russia being in my team, I would be at 20-25% (exactly the winrate I had during the last 60 games against Russia). It’s just stats…
https://wt.controlnet.space/ that is exactly why, for example here, we can see Russia has a tremendous 80-90% winrate in simulation GB. It’s because they never team up with NATO and always fight NATO instead. Because it is always Russia + China vs NATO, NATO always loose in every match (80-90% of the time), and Russia always wins. That’s why we see that NATO winrates are so, soo low.
That is exactly what would happen to me if I were to fight against Russia in every 13.0 GRB game. I wouldn’t have 45% winrate, I would have 10-25% at best.
If it’s just stats you surely could give a source instead of pulling numbers from your ass.
Russia has a 80-90% winrate in top tier sim because they can spawn their overpowered CAS straight away at the start of the game, which is pretty much the main win condition for Russia at top tier in general.
Their ground lineup is just decent-good, but at top tier NATO is generally much better off on the ground in terms of MBTs, LTs and SPAA (except maybe Britain and Italy). The only exception in the BMPT.
