You take a stat and add some random percentage(s) that you pulled out of your *ss.
1 Like
I do not care about your comments on the whys and wherefores the winrates are bad for X Y or Z reason, so it’s just better to consider KS or KD or whatever.
Bottom line : NATO winrates are bad, meaning Russia wins more often than NATO, meaning there is a russian bias ingame (aka : NATO is currently treated, somehow, so it looses majority of games at top tier GRB).
Stop coping
I’m deducing by your post you literally didn’t read mine, so I’m gonna repost it so you can read it this time :
It’s literally the same result for both if you use them with IRST, which the T90M has.
A trigger or a set time fuze will literally destroy a hovering helicopter the same way while using IRST, for a MBT shooting the shell.
It will also destroy a low flying jet locked with IRST as well, unless it goes SO FAST the distance between the air zone where the APFSDS is supposed to be shot and the actual position of the jet when the APFSDS finaly arrives is so important that the fuze doesn’t make any damage to the jet (in other words : never).
Concerning the T-80UK and T-80U-E1, they don’t have IRST so destroying a low flying jet can be difficult, but they can still use their rangefinder to easily destroy a hovering helicopter. So yes, their proxy he is still useful to them.
And you somehow still tried to use this “it’s not really a proxy he” argument to discredit me, you dishonest squirrel.
Do you understand Russia getting a proxy fuze or not proxy fuze doesn’t change anything ?
Oh no its not, thats like saying puma ahead or ctas hetf is just as good as bofors hevt on m247 or cv9040
1 Like
This shot :
3 days ago, I shot a BVM side ERA at 90 degrees angle from 15 meters, and it literally ate my 576mm of pen french APFSDS.
As I already stated it. Italy map, this post followed it right after the game : Russian Bias in 2026? - #3035 by SadRIPer
Easily checkable in the official replays with the timestamp
So all of this is false, is that what you’re saying right now ? Interesting
It literally just means Russia wins more often, Despite MANY NATO vehicles being incredibly superior to what Russia has to offer.
Simply look at the KD and KS of NATO vs Russian tanks, NATO vehicles are significantly better in that aspect, WR is really irrelevant for the reason I stated earlier.
1 Like
Trust me it is, the tnt explosive mass is just too much to compare it to those 2
They’re still vastly different,
Exactly like here.
Proxy munitions vs Time fuze are completely different in how they work and their capability.
Time fuze requires setup to work, not to mention only works for a set range. That means you can’t just snapshot it or shoot munitions down.
1 Like
Send a clip of it please. I’m not going through your replays for it
2 Likes
Russia doesn’t win more often than NATO out of thin air.
The majority of western players playing a NATO nation are not complete braindead idiots if that’s what you’re implying.
If Russia wins largely more than NATO, it’s for a reason (like artificial / shadow buffs regarding russian vehicles, for example). It’s called a bias towards Russia.
1 Like
@SadRIPer
Me: Defends NATO vehicles
“Stop defending Russia!”
Ah yes, cause Russia is NATO?
You showed videos that showcase roof armor, tracks, overlapping plates, and server issues causing problems; traits that are universal and impact all tank engagements without exception.
None of those videos showed ERA eating MBT APFSDS [or even HSTVL’s APFSDS for that matter, even if it should at high angles]. That is not an opinion, that is a repeating of the content of those videos, a summary.
So stop falsely accusing others of things. It wasn’t funny when I incorrectly did it in 2023 [as an incorrect method to get clarifications from people], and it’s not funny when others do it.
1 Like
They’re still vastly different,
But it doesn’t change anything, it’s exactly the same result 99% of the cases. So what’s your point ?
Exactly like here.
Proxy munitions vs Time fuze are completely different in how they work and their capability.Time fuze requires setup to work, not to mention only works for a set range. That means you can’t just snapshot it or shoot munitions down.
I explained by A+B+C why there is in practice no difference between the 2 shells. Do I have to repost the same post again
provide proof
This is a completely moronic argument, ofc the vehicles with the highest wr here are Russian, it’s almost like Russia has the highest wr rn and those vehicles all sit in the same lineup.
You’re taking the combined average winrate of all those vehicles and then separating it, making it look worse than it really is.
German 7.7 has a winrate of 38%
Guess what? Almost all German vehicles will have a winrate that is similiar to that, you’re blowing this way out of proportion
Same goes for 3.3
1 Like
Too bad, I’m not about to check all my games during the last 3 games just for you
Won’t respond to that, at that point I’m assuming you’re trolling
It fundamentally isn’t.
I’d rather have proxy over IRST + HE-TF any day
it’s a literal improvement.
Why?
I can do snapshots and don’t have to rely on my vehicle being able to lock that aircraft.
and again, I can shoot munitions down significantly better as the proxy detonates ON the munition, He-TF would need to hit it directily
1 Like
I think you should genuinely just shut up atp, you refuse to listen to any reason and instead just insult us and blame us of things we are not doing.
We’re not defending Russia, we’re trying to explain to you that you’re just straight up wrong
3 Likes
provide proof
I literally just did
This is a completely moronic argument, ofc the vehicles with the highest wr here are Russian, it’s almost like Russia has the highest wr rn and those vehicles all sit in the same lineup.
So Russia wins large majority of the games, thank you for this confession. Thus there is a bias ingame.
Nobody every shot a proxy he without locking with IRST first, there is like no point at all as it is very inaccurate.