can atleast buff su22m3? It has got 12 flares at 11.0.
You’ve literally been shown many, many times that the BS you cry is russian bias is in fact not.
Perfect example @pooqich shared to you multiple vidoes of the games ridiculous system for impacts of rounds.
Yet you claim it’s russian bias.
There, other videos exposing the exact opposite showing there is in fact a russia bias, and that it’s not “BS russian bias”. I stand on my point.
I’ve been playing nothing but top tier the last week and a half xD the only sht which is making it difficult is the BMPT if they removed that russian win rates would plummit same as when teh T58 was added and it completely wrecked 8.3 and down.
But they won’t ? And they’re not about to nerf it as well ? So we can agree there is currently a russian bias put in place because of the BMPT ?
Glad we agree on the point that there is, indeed, a russian bias at top tier.
then why are their win rates still 50 percent lol? russian win rates are not the highest at top tier at all.
Rigged numbers as I already said, everyone can play 30 top tier games in a row and see the wins and losses. Big majority of games will be won by Russia.
NATO nations have better winrates at top tier, because sometimes teamed up with Russia. Otherwise they would have 20-30% winrate maximum. I stand on my point.
the only thing that is stupidly broken RN in game is the BMPT, which even russian players are pissed at.
So there is, in fact, a russian bias. Interesting.
You cannot be serious lol, you are using tanks which for their BR are some of the best int eh game, the VBCI at 9.7 is potent as hell.
Oh wow I’m using the META vehicles to get a nuke, as Russia does. I’m out of line lmao.
Your truth, but against me they are lucky to even win 50% of their games lmao.
1 Like
Also that post is not the holy grail you act like it is lmao.
1 Like
- Mi cannons are incredibly accurate (like, really), more than they actually are IRL. Way more than AH or Tiger cannons.
- Spikes/MMPs are broken (gotta love hitting commander MG 2 times in a row, a cannon then 6 ERAs eating the ATGM) ;
- Bradley TOW-2B missiles are broken (ridiculous damage model) ;
- Tandem ATGMs sometimes get eaten by ERAs instead of getting through (the whole point of tandem ATGMs) ;
- Russian IFVs can launch their ATGMs on the move, while NATO IFVs cannot, for some reason. Also, NATO IFVs need to deploy the ATGM launchers, which takes a very long time ;
I don’t think those are false. They’re simple facts.
T-series model are broken (ERAs/side armors in general and autoloaders eat DARTs
In particular, I don’t think this one is false neither, as proven by this post :
And these clips :
I’m probably coping, right.
TOW quite literally stands for Tube-launched, Optically tracked, Wire-guided
i forgot this piece of shit even existed
funny how you leave out the most produced modern nato mbt out
they actually did increase the hitbox size of traverse modules and added an autoloader module
because armor will mean nothing if they implemented those megadarts
cool now russian mbts have literally nothing going for them
surely you would then agree that they stand at a significantly lower br than the superior nato mbts
RIGHT?
and all of those have different things that make them stand out against others
there are two A7’s ingame
1 Like
I couldn’t be bothered to, so I just called out the obviously wrong ones, and the ones that know about.
2 Likes
I watched a couple of the clips in that post and I absolutely wasn’t impressed.
Some of the ones I watched were simply volumetric and some were just bad shots.
1 Like
What kind of logic is this ?
A few nations will get darts which will pen everything everywhere ?
You don’t care about balance, as long as Nato is OP i guess.
4 Likes
What people don’t realize is that would either lead to Russian tanks being downtiered (have fun with a 11.7/12.0 BVM), or them being buffed so that the new darts don’t really change much when facing them.
2 Likes
It’s simply not true. Sweeden is very rich, neighbor of Russia, so they do need IRST in case of an invasion.
The arguments people be using to justify the artificially nerfed stuff of NATO side.
Yea, or they will play nato vs nato on 14.0
1 Like
they have something in common with many other clips ive posted
bonus rng
2 Likes
No, it’s not true.
Yesterday, I saw a post stating and showing an american humvee something with atgm launch (laser guided one) being launched with radio technology something, without string.
It can shoot on the move.
If I find the post back I’ll edit the post.
i dont think you really undestood what i meant by what i said
this kind of armor IS OVERMATCHED BY DM63
yet it bounced
because some farthuffer thought it would be funny to leave the ricochets to rng
1 Like
1 Like
2h40m is literally 16 games, if we consider a game lasts 10min (they usually last even longer).
So it’s not even 16 games lmao.
“That’s a lot of time spent playing a tank”, right. I almost forgot you were a raigebaiter man.
60 games, I take you had 30 against Russia and 30 alongwith Russia (Italy is most likely paired with Russia at top tier) ?
So it means your 67% is being increased by half the games. Deduct those games, you plummet at 20-37%.
What are you trying to prove exactly ? lmao.
I’m not aware of any vehicle-based ATGM that is issued in the US or any other western country capable of firing on the move that is represented in-game, but if you find the footage and post I’d be glad to know more.
1 Like
It’s not better than the HSTVL at all man, that’s just a straight up false hood, if you put the HSTVL at the same BR as the 2S38 it’ll definitely blow it out the water.
I just don’t see them at all, what I do see are BMPTs wiping teams with extreme prejudice.
As I’ve said I’m playing France, Italy, and China at 11.7 and up and don’t see Lmurs etc much.
the new pantsir as well don’t see it much. I did mention it shooting down my munitions a couple times if you’d bothered to read
Shall we go through the past 5 years of additions between germany russia and america and see how many are busted or have been busted throughout the years?
it’s literally what they do, tree by tree they have a flavour of the month.
lol no not just alvis.
I’ve seen literally pages of different people arguing agianst the point of russian MBTs being busted.
You’ve just chosen to ignore it completely.
@_Renzo is one of the few you can see in here actively proving your point wrong . He doesn’t bait people, he converses with them. as well as @pooqich again, doesn’t bait or try provoke anything just counter argues points which are created by stupidity.
Sorry what? none of my arguments work ? why not? because they don’t suit the narrative that you are pushing
I’ve over four thousand hours and 6 years playing the game mate, I’ve seen BS biases for each nation come and go.
I can’t deny flightpaths? what about flightpaths?
debuff russia seen it all now.
They added DM53, M829A2, 5 second reloads to almost every NATO MBT, they added SPAA such as the IRIS T which blew stuff like pantsir out the water.
THe first heavy cruiser premium in game was german and broke naval for time as well.
video proof has never been used by gaijin which has always been a well known fact.
The fact you don’t understand how it may be edited and changed tells us everything we need to know.
They’ve actively rejected video sources for every vehicle in game, irregardless of it being Russian or not.
get your head out the sand.
they actually over buffed the leclercs cause of peoples sources.
@Ralin has proper sources which prove the reload rate of leclercs for example is too fast.
However gaijin used souces provided and now it has an A historcal reload rate.
as a caveat Ralin yeah I looked into it I was completely wrong about the leclercs reloads as well as their spall liners.
A yes the same Germany that got the puma at 8.3.
the same germany which has South african lights which should rightfully be in the british tree.
teh same germany which is loaded with super strong light tanks from the BR of 6.7 and up?
It’s not a bias for them not to be added to the game yet.
Spikes are decent as has been proved, not great, not bad.
Decent.
They get lofting and then almost every ground vehicle in game is buggered, same as they should remove lofting from the LMURs completely.
Hellfires flight paths also follow not too far off what they should IRL BTW, they loft up then come down when supposed to.
It’s been a merry goround for a while at top tier. Germany had all the eggs not long ago, IRIS T, Phoon, 2A7 ?
or we brushing over that.
USA had the F15E , 6 abrams between the prems and TT ones all firing the highest penning L/44 round in game.
HSTVL etc or shall we glaze over that.
the big three always have had preferntial treatment for ages.
Oh japan as well with teh Type 90s sitting under BR’d for ages completely destroyed 10.3 - 11.3 for months
Starting with the SU30SM which as far as I can tells only real “bias” is the fact it has the two engine mounted missiles.
the double rack AMRAAM carriers FOR WHAT PLANE cause you got them on the F18s.
So on the topic of ARB, which has pretty much been dominated for years by the USA, then the gripen followed by USA, then the Rafale followed by the typhoons.
Which BTW absolutely dust the Su30SM easily.
ARB russian planes were always cheeks lol. MIG23M with a whopping 12 CMs up against stuff like the F4E with 90, more missiles, better FM, better gun. ETC
What missing weapon was added to china?
Also my opinion on the KH38MT is well known, it should be removed until proven it exists. Not left in game until proven it doesn’t
It’s also not just in russia though so.
what like giving germanies Typhoon brimstones it historically never had?
or completely nuetering one of the typhoons most tactically advatnageous weapons it has?
GNSS modelling doesn’t work for anyone though? it’s not like it works for russia either.
Wait until you realise that most weapons in game don’t function like they’re supposed to
And there it is so many of “our” cas weapons.
You’ve got literally F18s, F15Es, F16s and even F14s if you’re brave enough to choose from and all of which can carry stand-off munitions.
Why are Brimstones the only Missile at top tier which doesn’t have some kind of fire and forget feature like say, the 6 mavericks an F16 can carry.
Because they’ll likely add things like the F15EX to add it to.
Also is it proven that those aircraft can carry it?
No one has ever disputed that THEY HAVE WORSE MBTS is the point lol.
the dudes also in no position to be commenting on others performance.
2 Likes