It should still move up to 11.7 or even 12.0 and/or get it’s survivability fixed, however most 11.7+ tanks can deal with it fine.
My man… it’s the last sentence of the post you replied to, on its own.
I stopped commenting on the BMPT’s BR after the end of my cross analysis that proved it could be 11.3/11.7. Any higher would require new evidence that overpowers the evidence of cross-analysis.
For reference, this was the cross analysis that criticized BMPT being 10.3:
M4A3E2 is 2.0 BR higher than M4 Sherman [2.3 higher than one or two 3.3 Shermans].
IS-4M is 2.3 BRs higher than KV-122.
Matilda III vs most A13s: 2.3.
Heavy armor without weapons changes doesn’t see more than 2.3 currently.
So that proved that BMPT should be at least 11.3 based on the fact its offensive capabilities are at 9.3 without armor.
So no, I’m not commenting on its BR at this time; there’s no new information.
I’ll talk about what’s better than BMPT: Challenger 2, T-72B3, T-80U [It’s in Sweden too].
And I can tell you effective BMPT hunters with less HEAT protection than the above: M1A1, Merkavas, IPM1, Ariete, MBT-2000…
But I cannot tell you if all of those vehicles’ BRs are correct, because 11.7 - 12.7 is heavily decompressed to the point M1A1 and Leclerc are 1.0 apart despite being 95% similar in mobility, armor, and lethality.
Honestly, it should just be removed unless they model a kinetic round ripping off the entire turret since that’s what would happen to those twigs holding 4 ATGMs and 2 machine guns.
5 Likes
It’s called russian bias, I just got another nuke with VBCI only without sweating. Russia was on the other side.
It’s nearly unfeasible at top top tier if you’re not on Russia side. Never had so easy times getting a nuke.
At 9.7, Russia seems to loose as much as they win. Again, for the 154th time, when you play NATO side at top top tier, you loose 80% of the time.
I have been playing 30-40 games at 9.7 and it’s refreshing, it actually seems I win and loose equally, whatever side I’m on (Russia or NATO). Again, it is NOT the case at top top tier, large majority of the games played are won by Russia.
I don’t know how to say it another way, just play 30 games in a row and see it by yourself. Russia wins too much at top top tier because the tier is simply too much unbalanced in favor of Russia.
First : it did happen, litterally just check the related game at the exact time I posted (my last game was the one where it happened, and I disconnected then posted about this bs).
Second : you always shoot on the most angled part top of the UFP, did you really expect not to bounce ? lmao. Just shoot at the manlet as everyone else. Or LFP. Or turret neck.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Brother just queue up with me I won’t let the russians hurt you anymore
1 Like
Mods deleted my comments on chinese names 😭 chinese bias
Man I’ve got couple of nukes, I know when it is a sequel of skill issues on my part, and when there are objective facts showing a bias is put in place to make a particular nation win more than usual, lol
There is a way to never go up against russia…
I’ll never spend a single additionnal dime in a game puting in place a bias on purpose.
Also, I edited the long bias list with another element :
Mi cannons are incredibly accurate (like, really), more than they actually are IRL. Way more than AH or Tiger cannons.
Are you ready to get sniped 3km away by Mi-28NMs in infantry mode ?
Infantry mode is a LONGGGGG way from being successful. I am positive it’s going to be Naval all over again, nice to have but not going to be a big hit.
1 Like
I post that here, interesting thought.
The best MBTs are still NATO, and many high tier NATO MBTs are either competitive or outright the best for their BRs.
In exchange they have bad penetration and long reloads. It’s balanced, just asymmetrically.
Equally good, if not substantially better because they have better mobility, and sometimes better firepower.
Woah tanks have things the tanks have IRL. Most of that isn’t that useful anyways.
If it was the Us tree wouldn’t be the best air tree with probably the most undertiered and/or OP planes. France wouldn’t have dominated air RB for an entire year either.
I think you should take a break from WT.
5 Likes
he wont because he plays wt to seethe at russia
3 Likes
would YOU expect it to bounce? mind you this is not some extreme angle, its just a type 89 staring at me
dont try blaming me for the game having utterly insane ricochet calculations (they are, infact, RNG btw)
funny how you only responded to one clip and none of the others hahahaha
1 Like
- only laser guided atgms can be launched on the move
- pretty sure only the bradley has to deploy its launchers
you yourself know this is not true cmon man
yeah it felt real nice penning a 2a4 LFP and yellowing its loader a bit
did you forget how horrid post pen used to be on NATO mbts?
what for? so they can UFP everything? this sure does sound quite biased
dont forget that the russian 125 already fires its best available dart, and its already behind other top tiers
can happen to literally any tank
good luck doing that to a 2a7
but this goes both ways
the t32e1 is literally unpennable upfront for anything thats not firing high pen heat
they don’t have it irl
It’s not like the VBCIs are that hard to play lol.
YOU lose 80% of the time, many other people have already told you their experiences are different.
So for the 155th time, stop acting like you talk for the whole NATO playerbase.
Oh no he got a couple of nukes, that clearly means he is a good player.
It’s not like nukes are that hard to get. I often simply don’t spawn them so I can get more kills/caps/assists to get more RP&SL, or I only spawn thwm last second for the one minute to midnight award.
2 Likes
Yeah majority of those play mainly russia :)
He talks like that because… we have multiple posts from different authors regarding russians being blatantly OP with stated facts from flight path to armor to in game added vehicles… ;)
2 Likes
