Schizophrenia.
1 Like
T-90M is among the worst top tier MBTs in the game.
Where is your T-90M? Surely you have it to be saying its amazing.
1 Like
You also have to be pretty special to have a K/D below 1.0 in the M1 Abrams, yet here you are.
2 Likes
chat can we crack 30 views on my profile in a day from ppl with no arguments
But but it takes a small amount of effort to deal with, that has to mean it’s overpowered no?
1 Like
T-90M just has armor. It can’t even hide its weakspots due to a lack of depression. Everything else about it? Bad or average.
Mobility? Trash. Reverse? Don’t even. Reload? Abysmal. Round? Below average, still workable. Gun depression? A joke. Gun handling? Admittedly good, but it is nothing special, just on par with NATO.
buddy my whole point has been that this ‘small’ amount of effort to deal with is a big advantage if it’s not reciprocated in other nations
y’all really like shooting yourselves in the foot, too bad gaijin doesn’t hold your hand here too eh?
excellent armor and the rest is about average except the reverse speed. armor is meta, like i said.
coupled with the ridiculously broken damage model, ERA, spall liner, autoloader… again there’s a reason almost all chinese players and cheaters have one. it’s pretty much the only tank that can actually tank broadside shots at 90 degrees
but hey i know admitting this would be devastating for your ego, i don’t expect an epiphany anytime soon
Its amazing how delusional you are.
1 Like
the armor on the Leo 2A7 or the Strv 122 is meta, not on the T-90
5 Likes
2A7s and Strv 122s are more survivable, have better mobilty and better firepower.
It takes me about as much effort to deal with a T-90M as it takes me to deal with an Abrams or Leopard 2A5-2A6. So not much.
3 Likes
lol yeah armor is only relevant when it’s convenient for your point of view
meanwhile i’m consistent and say it’s meta overall.
T series have smaller weakspots that are harder to hit when hull down for example
meanwhile Leos have that gaping hole under the gun and are softer than a russian main above the barrel
you’re so cool (see above)
When you make dozens of claims never once providing even one piece of evidence after challenge, you should expect to be scrutinized.
Even I will provide evidence when my active claims are challenged if I didn’t provide it in the post itself.
Leopard 2A5’s turret weakspot is the smallest in the game.
T-80BVM’s is the size of Abrams, and T-90M’s is marginally smaller than that.
2 Likes
i dont see too much of a difference here
the whole area to the left of the cannon, on the leo, will just eat the round with volumetrics and dosent even manage to get into the crew compartment
i would still say that the Leo has better armor and a better round than the T-90M
2 Likes
T80 has a thinner LFP, viewport is harder to hit, breech is covered by a piece of armor which can absorb entire darts
Leo has a larger breech, a large weakpoint behind the viewport, massive neck area under the gun and can be OHK with an HE to the roof
And that’s just from the front, T90 can tank rounds broadside thanks to the overperforming ERA, doesn’t have to worry about HE, and Leo can barely even look in the rear arc without the FCS limitation
You’ve been relying on bias too long and it shows
At this point its just obvious you have a severe case of Russian derangement syndrome and the only cure is going to be playing them.
The sad thing is the cure is hundreds of hours and/or dollars so most people won’t bother, grind really sucks and forces people into bad perspectives.
4 Likes
Yet another comment with no substance. And wanting that last word so hard that you even avoid @ing me lmao. Bravest Russian main right there, no wonder you need/deny the handholding
The issue here is that it is only an aggregate across per player cross-section , not on a per vehicle basis, and as many players use many vehicles and nations, looking at this while useful to get an idea isn’t of any great statistical power.
Possibly, but without a CDF I couldn’t be absolutely certain that this was the case.
There still remain a number of yet to be implemented, somewhat significant accepted bug reports across a number of issues. Which as a whole may impact it sufficiently to cause it to change BR. I just really wish that reports weren’t subject to “only happening if we need to Alter the balance”, thinking.
A shortlist of the "accepted" bugs (related to the Abrams) I'm keeping track of
ERA cannot defeat APFSDS rounds.
Failed shots is not ERA “over-performing”.
Soviets have no bias and never have.
1 Like