Have you ever considered that the majority of less effective players are simply people that bought the idea of playing your nation’s vehicles e.g., M1A2 Abrams and so on, where the same people buy the highest possible vehicle without knowledge of the game and it’s stomped alive by more experienced players that don’t care about experiencing something less than broken than a Leopard 2A7V or overwhelm matches with T-80BVM,
I don’t get, since when Russia got a prototype from 2020? 2S38 if you mean, it’s not a prototype it’s a production vehicle, it’s in service. This is the type of line of thought in the Forums that I don’t like, the Caernarvon02’s line of thought everything but Western military tech actually works and Eastern is simply dreams and hopes, the combat module from the 2S38 is inspired by another combat module used in a coastal defence ship of the Russian navy using similar cannon but in a more simplified and smaller system to fit into a chassis.
I won’t argue regarding the whole dump on fire that is the Kh-38MT existance or not that MythicPi brought to life, I actually agree with him but I believe the Kh-38MT is not a weapon but a designation of family of weapons based in infra-red and inertial guidance systems of the Kh-38, which helps his argument that the picture he provides is of the Kh-38ME.
So no, it doesn’t prove and at the moment is never going to be proven that Russian bias exists when nations like China barely scratches a battle rating changes with vehicles like the Type 59 and Type 69 having proper weapons and capability to have a battle rating increase, or maybe the ItPsV 90 still at battle rating 8.7 despite other less effective Swedish vehicles have the opposite threatment.
If you disagree with my opinion, then prove me wrong, give me or everyone with same opinion as mine data of this Russian bias where Russian vehicles is overperforming over others and this is not tin foil hats’ ideas.
Good, 13.0 GRB should be long queues, stop running CAS and play 12.0 instead.
@Mujahidin
There’s zero reason for me to play Soviets when other tech trees are more interesting and better.
The only reason I’d play top BR Soviets is to finish getting the final helicopter I want.
Your post is calling vehicles a joke, then providing evidence that proves that claim in-game.
The more modern a vehicle is for a BR vs the other vehicles of that BR, the worse that vehicle is, AKA the vehicle is “a joke”.
Your entire post is just proving that their vehicles are inferior in-game.
If Soviet tech tree vehicles were as superior as you claim, the BRs of their older equipment would be higher than the BRs of newer equipment of other tech trees as a rule.
Also win rate is a metric of skill not vehicle capability.
Your entire post is just defending Russian equipment, and proving their equipment is inferior without you realizing it.
@HOMINUSNOCTURNO-live
Weird how I defend American equipment and your post implies USA is Russia…
The tech tree is Soviet, and your post is projecting your defense of equipment onto me instead of admitting that said equipment is inferior.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but American equipment is superior to your precious Soviet tech tree equipment.
My 1990s Abrams matches and even slightly exceeds the capabilities of your 2010s 90M.
Keep pushing propaganda though, you’ll certainly beat us Americans defending American equipment if your posts keep saying 2+2=6.
Also the only tech trees with prototype ground vehicles for 11.7 and 12.0 lineups are China, USA, Sweden, Britain, Germany, France, and Italy. Soviets only have production equipment.
You mean those could be propaganda pictures? Sure yeah ok lol is there any proof anywhere they’ve been used? Or work? Most Russian garbage doesnt like the Pantisr IRL 😂😂
You can find them easily there is also a video that shows the launch inside of the cockpit of su34 and later on the impact, i would show the video but gaijing doesnt really like air strikes footage, the ML is certanly real, the one that is probably not is the MT.
The only people that cry about russia have no idea where to aim (used to be me) and never played a tank with 4km reverse and 5 degrees of gun depression.
Just like Russian main cry about strv122 and leopard 2a7 they don’t know how to aim neither (how do they? most of the times enemy entire frontal hull is green)
That a path you do not want to go , we got more US main crying about russian armour than Soviet main crying about Swed/Ger armour. The soviet main crying about Sed/Ger is temporary but US main crying is literally all year around. Not just armour , they will literally pick the mildest shit to cry about , Soviet main might not be the brightest but sure as shit US main is no better
