To me it’s having things like the only medium range SPAA in the game, the Pantsir, and not giving correct Brimstones and still no Longbows for Apache or it’s correct radar target quing despite Spike existing.
Star Streaks have a collision problem.
F-111 fails to fold wings to 45 degrees with gun-pods on and missing AIM9’s in the chinweapon bay when the gun is installed.
Half the missiles are missing correct range values.
Missing CBU 97 cluster munitions. The US never signed anything forbidding them. They just give them a timer for unexploded munitions safety.
Challenger 2 tank is too high off the ground.
Missing backup control systems in aircraft.
Spall liners over performing.
There’s a bout 20 things in this category, some of which have been addressed in the ADATS model refinements for instance.
It comes in the form of missing options like ERA for the Bradley for instance or the lack of a CBU-5 gun-pod for F-16’s making them A-16’s. Missing MBT rounds.
Kh 39 has no counter launched outside of Top SPAA range.
The old SU25 models that could eat a dozen stingers and Ka50’s/52’s that could eat several MBT rounds through the center of the cockpit. These 2 have been reduced and are historic now.
Not always but it does sometimes feel like the game is balanced by a selfish kid who won’t let you play with the new toys only the old and broken toys. Or maybe even snaps off a wheel and hands it over for you to play with then.
It has physical hull geometry that is different excluding separate to TUSK upgrades. They should give the mine plow as an option too. Missing options are annoying too.
But we can’t have Longbows!
*breaks your toy and hands it to you. *Takes it back, breaks off Radar and target queuing system. “There you go fixed it for you”
~Gaijin.
Cool then lie down and die I guess, don’t try to do anything other than use your tanks as a static pillbox like the Iraqis, I’m sure that will pan out great. We call this a tactical failure if you do this.
Reminder that Bradleys, something that I would hope that people would consider to be inferior to a MBT in a normal head on engagement, succeeded in killing more armor than the M1s in the opening engagements during the gulf war, and 3BM17 has 0 issues dealing with those things, same with T-62Ms and T-55s.
That is unless you somehow think that the equivalent of 50mm of RHA is somehow enough to stop rounds from those vehicles which is laughable.
Still a MBT vs a IFV chassis, the firepower of all of the above was still vastly superior to the CFVs leading attacks.
However, the skill of Bradley crews in the gulf war was vastly superior to even the Republican Guard tank crews, with Bradley crews actually exploiting the weakness of T series tanks and the RG deployments to defeat them.
It turns out that when your enemy sports better optics and mobility its not optimal to just entrench and stare out into the desert.