65B has only 51kg
the Kh-38mt has 152kg
triple the HE
yeah, it supposed to be better than 120A/B but by the time 77-1 in service everyone running around with C-7 or D already.
I did something similar on Poland last year though that one was hyper-aggressive.
And one of those frags was an R3 T20 for some reason.
Out of the multiple matches played so far, if I was shot I was dead, and the basket changed nothing.
I know what happens with an Abrams when it gets shot after fragging hundreds to thousands of them, and using them.
And my assessment that the basket only really changes one situation where no crew dies but the basket AND engine get knocked out… that’s still the truth.
Oh, and my stats will never show how many T-80Us, Abrams, Leclercs, and Leopard 2A5s I’ve fragged because hundreds of my frags against them were in assault arcade, an invaluable training tool that made me learn how to ammo rack Abrams and Leopard 2s, their best weak spots in practice, and so forth.
That knowledge easily translated to other tanks.
also mavs dont always over pressure because of how gaijin models shaped charges which is why people like the 65G (which actualy has slightly less explosive mass than the 65D)
Newest video from DollarPlays with KW-1 gameplay on 7:40 survived 2 big bomb hits only tracked…
Like come on some people blindly defend that there is a bias in this game… Im not talking that bias is all around but some tanks and (in some updates with new vehicles) one nation is in favor and it is obvious
So you’re complaining that there’s heavy tank bias now…
One nation only fielded heavy tanks? lol That’s a wild take.
Those bombs were 500 pound bombs (226.796kg). The KV-1 has thick armour so it definitely wouldn’tve done anything, but please cope more
Oh so it has more pen too? For the draw back in HE filler. Seems pretty balanced
“this one time this thing happened in this video i watched of a youtuber so its all very biased” Cmon champ, at least try harder than that to prove a point
at this point its obvious that you are just intentionally acting stupid to derail the thread
Defusing your ill founded arguments is now “acting stupid”
What a great point you have, why didn’t I think of that???
If you think that responding to your ‘arguments’ with facts is acting stupid then you need to lwk hop off the internet
SB player here but the only Russian Bias I’ve come across was/is the BI jet/rocket thing which stupidly fights props and the Yak-2KABB which was an absolutely abysmal aircraft in reality and yet in War Thunder can beat C.200’s in turning fights and can climb/prop hang like a 109.
If anything it’s the German bias in WW2 tiers (both tank and air) that’s the issue from the gameplay I’ve witnessed. Also Gaijin’s sheer venom for anything British.
the BI jet holds 40 rounds max tho
yeah the “fact” that HEAT warheads arent less reliable than large HE
if thats what you all consider facts you probably need to get something checked
It doesn’t matter when it’s fighting considerably slower props which have almost zero chance of catching it. It’s also rather agile from what I’ve seen.
I just gave an example of stuff that should not happen and it happens mostly in one nation :)
A lot of content creators notice that sooo yeah…
This happens in top tier ground top tier jets you can’t deny it…
Most tech trees have heavy tanks, and Germany has the most.
The content creators disagree with your posts’ lies.
They don’t claim only one nation has heavy tanks.
Where did I say something about heavy tanks? you acting stupid just to detrack the argument :)
Nope a lot of them actualy prove it some point and discuss it…
nobody claimed anything stop trying to force to anyone here that i said somehting else :)
kw-1 was not that shiellded from pressure which the bombs create not talking only about armor and protection vs bomb fragments.