You’re speaking for yourself, not for me.
Motorola’s record shows zero evidence of Russian bias. His first page of 30 high-KDR vehicles are almost all if not all non-Soviet.
If I check any major YouTuber’s statcard, their stats will show Soviet vehicles as equal to everything else, because there is not and has never been Russian bias.
You can live in your fan-fiction all you want, more power to you. That fan-fiction won’t become reality though.
Even if we assume that Soviet vehicles as equal to everything else (which dont) as you say, dont you think its weird such bad tanks as ‘‘Ghost of tel aviv’’ , ‘‘motorola’’ and others have described to perform ( at least ) equally with the others tanks that have better gun depression , better mobility, better reloads etc …?
Good job proving RU had the most event/premium vehicles added in the early days.
Now sort through the most played vehicles and you’ll see a pretty different story when looking at those vehicles’ stats.
Not picking either side, But what would the kd ratio thing look like with say, 50 or 75 vehicles?
Also a question for everyone else, Which statistic would most likely represent russian bias?
Like winrate only shows how good a nation is at winning, which would kinda work if they were only played as 1 nation vs 1 nation. The K/D% seems a bit closer, at least for top tier bias. But is also effected by the hordes of premium people that charge forward which kinda skews the stats. (had a ussr match end in 2 minutes due to odl’s)
Gonna be a parrot but the BI is also 1 vehicle thats stupidly low for its br Being at minimum an 8.7 (Also the scorpion’s, but about an 8.3 vehicle)
Obviously K/D ratio is the closest bias evidence .
Welcome to the BR system.
I play Challenger 2 and T-80U almost identically, which is also how I have similar performances in them.
I treat all top MBTs about the same, and where that screwed me was with T-80BVM whose turret armor is seen at 10.3. And in a scope, with how small the turret is, the weak turret behind the ERA looks massive compared to the ERA coverage so people have an easier time hitting that.
Outside that, if people aim for T-80BVM’s hull I perform similarly in it as I do Challenger 2.
Hull weakspots on close maps are universal.
If T-series tanks were OP, these people would have at least 50% higher KDR & KMR than their other same-class tanks to hint at something being OP. If it’s double, sure it’s probably OP.
Obviously cross-analysis is superior to using that type of stat comparison.
@USAARMY369
Sorry, but your post is wrong. USA has strong tanks.
The images you posted also show that.
Every nation will have a certain playstyle. Every nation will also have broken “OP” vehicles at different tiers. It’s just the nature of how the game works.
It’s not about that. Event vehicles often have insane stat due low and skilled playerbase. Same for some prems (like T-34 prototype from closed beta). If you speaking generally about the nation like “RU tanks are easier/harder to play”, then such vehicles is absolutely not suitable as an example.
No I don’t think America has the best tank because the armor still doesn’t have DU and is not as thick as Sep V3 with V3 they have M829A4 bullets that penetrate 800mm against all types of Russian era and are equipped with Israeli APS and LWS so I think they are the best for America
M829A4
??? I dont know this tank
The turret armor is DU in-game, it’s just an allegedly incorrect number.
Hull DU was SEP3 allegedly.
A3 and A4 are entirely unnecessary when M829A2 is the best MBT round fired out of the 2nd best cannon.
And DM53 is the 2nd best MBT round sometimes fired out of the best cannon.
Father of Armata
that is T-95
There are a couple more options.
Premium vehicles in general don’t really drag the K/D down by much.
All three big nations have their fair share of wallet warriors ODLing, so you can’t get to any conclusion using that.
Every new addition brings Russian bias the BUK M3 is ridiculous and while it has some issues when they fix them it will kill everything in the sky while having 3 lives…What a great idea.
This is another aspect of ‘‘russian bias’’ in the game …thx for admiting this
which is?
