they’re OP at most BRs, there are just a few rare exceptions like tiger2 and some NATO CAS at ~10.0 which russian copers always try to use to distract from their sealclubbing at top tier
what other BRs besides top tier
1 Like
No because Nobody else has those shells or anything similar
It doesn’t matter because their shells aren’t anywhere near the best at their BR. It doesn’t negatively impact the game.
The Russian 85mm could pen jumbos Front plates at one point which even much more powerful guns werent able to do yes it Effects gameplay
remind me?
If you mean the MG port that’s where literally everyone shoots…
2 Likes
Nope just the Main plate far from the mg Port
the brs around kv1s, t34-85, is4m, t55s, obj279 and pretty much anything above that
kv1 is only funny in downtiers, the 34-85 is mid, t54/55´s can be good and obj279 is a obj279…
(in most br´s there is sth better in other techtree´s)
4 Likes
it’s fascinating how pakistani, indian and chinese players love russia in this game so much
I´m from europe btw(only bc I´m in this squad doesnt mean I´m from pakistan/muslim or anything…)
2 Likes
and arent the best kv1 the finnish one?(this thing should be moved up)
and i’ll provide a screenshot of it and you’ll say ‘but that’s only one time!!!’, you have to move the goalposts because you’re dishonest
btw it’s really 18 or 20 battles at this point, not that it matters. it could be 1000 in a row you couldn’t change your mind because you’d have to admit to yourself you’ve been getting carried this whole time
both can be true, and in fact both are likely to be true if one or the other is
again this speaks for itself which is why bias deniers ignored it
As I said, I regularly see only one player for the USSR, always on the losing side which is interesting. Must be that MM fixing you’re talking about lmao.
I only feel like I’m getting carried while using superior western designs at the same BR.
2 Likes
I simply don’t believe there to be some ulterior motive towards russia from gaijin’s end, however I do believe that there is a deep and subconscious ‘special treatment’ they get, and that is seen in virtually every controversial russian vehicle, weapon, br change or so on.
Addressing this is impossible since the problem originates from certain members of the bug reporting staff and development & vehicle research teams
It’s much harder to nerf russian vehicles with accurate sources than it is to buff them with inaccurate ones…
can you point out where you said that? you probably can’t since you’re either confused or hallucinating, but either way that sentence proves my point about the win rates being faked by inserting russian players on losing teams lol
i definitely agree, i just don’t see why you find it unfathomable that this bias in historical accuracy doesn’t extend to other areas of the game, especially those that are more behind-the-scenes like the damage model and the matchmaker. it’s all been a pattern for >10 years at this point
I guess you’re the type of a guy that needs /s at the end to understand pretty clear things.
Gaijin has bent historical accuracy for many nations, so using this as a proof of bias is hilarious.
4 Likes
nah the sarcasm didn’t come through, maybe it did in your head based on intonation - doesn’t change the fact that evidence can’t change your mind, which is what you were trying to deflect there. embarrassing
indeed, ignoring evidence for russia once and 10,000,000 times for US means it’s exactly the same thing (see? that’s how you write sarcasm)
this is true yes