Russian Bias in 2024?

Average KV-1 in a downtier:

IMG_2091

1 Like

yeah, when does European get meteor then?

Ariete and Merkeva made Russia mediocre lol good joke

I’ve literally been penned by DM23, dude, in an Abrams.

2 Likes

you can kill a t90m with a dm23, but you have to aim well, same goes with the abrams but there is a large difference on how easy to do between a leclerc and an abrams… saying otherwise is just stupid


4 Likes

btw, you can kill M1A1/A2 with DM13 through the turret ring consistently

1 Like

i dont know i remember i made veghead from THC disconnect for the call after his bomb landed on me and did nothing and he did a suicide dive.

you can also kill it wit ha russia nt34 from ww2.

these people are unstable lol

but remember… if it sells enough $$$$ gaijin will never balance it.

I’ve noticed that Russian tanks seem to “get shit done”; it’s something that honestly catches me by surprise when I’m using them. If it’s all because this game has a bias towards Russian vehicles, it could be chalked up to how this game is Russian in origin. Coupled with that, it does encourage me to have more of an appreciation for Soviet mechanized weapons (tanks and planes, at least), even if it might be historically inconsistent…not that I’d know for certain on that aspect.

I guess one personal issue might be that I sought to prioritize other countries’ tech-trees, and I haven’t prioritized Russia’s. But, considering that Russian vehicles (WWII Soviet ones, at least) are pretty good, I ought to sort my shit out and consider committing more towards Russia, and save, like, Germany for later.

1 Like

Russian bias in 2024? Honestly, when i want an easy experience, I just take Soviets/Russians, I am rarely frustrated, it is really easier than other nations I play, especially in tanks. I don’t know if it can be called bias, but I would just call it patriotism.

1 Like

Same but with Sweden.

I really like how people in this thread comparing this to new premium harrier

Spoiler

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ogezYvtrocA

Yeah, show me a top-tier attack jet you can do a 52k/d while playing GRB only. Its literally one of the clearest instances of bias in this game. In current game state russian tt doesnt need 95ya6 or kh-38 at all.

Russian planes were using R-27ERs vs Aim-7ms for over a year and once they finally got somehow balanced with the introduction of fox-3, su-27sm got 12 missiles… while playing against jets with just 6 of them most of the time.

When I had to choose a nation with vehicles that survive shots they should not the most… it would be “udssr tech tree”

Direct hit to the ammo ammo turns black and tank shoots back like nothing happend

In some other vehicles you explode when your ammo turns slightly yellow

2 Likes

Nah there’s definitely bias. Your probably just paid by gaijin to say that. Russias win Rate is like 80% The US,UK have nothing to shoot down the bias SU25 when it can launch ATGM from 15km and never miss. Play some besides Russia and you’ll notice a giant Difference

3 Likes

@HOMINUSNOCTURNO
So according to your post, War Thunder’s critics are paid by Gaijin and War Thunder’s defenders aren’t. Got it.
Also Russia doesn’t have a win-rate as they’re not a tech tree.
Soviet win rates are also classified, so you wouldn’t know its win rate unless you were an employee and you’d be breaking NDA if you did.
Your post also claims all ten tech trees in War Thunder are all Russia; Russia is not any of them.
Keep claiming that all vehicles ever made in the world are Russian, your posts are easily shut down that way.

1 Like

You should stop saying that. It leads to confusion when it appears that you are being the opposite of a critic. Also, just say that you play all TTs, instead of phrasing it as the other person saying something they didn’t. (This is constructive, genuine criticism, because they seem to be the person to attack you as a person instead of your ideas)

They’re probably one of the people that believe that top tier is the important BR ingame, and that top tier winrates are the only way to judge how good a tree is. Either way, I agree, and that user in incorrect.

4 Likes

I was under pain as well as reading an extremely sassy post from an account that’s spamming topics, and whose posts contain provocative language.
It takes less time to search up someone in-game than it does to make a post.
I hope you can understand the process of making that post.

One Russian moderator assured me that this is very realistic, and that a real missile can intercept aerial targets just as easily.

Now I’ve decided to level up the Russian aviation tree, and during the Cold War era, the Russians always had issues with aviation — engines were underpowered and had low durability, the overall manufacturing quality was poor. Because of this, Russian planes carried little payload, were hard to maintain and repair, etc. It’s quite amusing to see how GJ compensated for this in the game—Russian planes in the game have major issues with drag, which is severely understated. You constantly have to monitor your speed so your wings don’t fall apart, and landing some planes is extremely difficult because they don’t have air brakes and lose speed very poorly.

1 Like

Not at all, just you. Have you managed to record the video comparing the forced turn of the F-14 and F-111 yet? Remember, I asked you to do that when you called the F-111 the best fighter at 11.7?

1 Like