Russian Autoloader buff is ridiculous

Where is your source of a T80U shooting 5 rounds within 30 seconds? Where is the proof of an Abrams moving and reloading the gun consistently every 5 seconds? I don’t know where is it tell me

3bm60 is 6.4 sec,big deal?

then why ask for a leopard buff with the source of a single guy reloading a leopard in 5 seconds? there pretty good as is rn

They, don’t. At least western models don’t, Eastern, maybe, but unlikely.

5.0 sec reload is fine, it doesn’t need any better, but if the Abrams has it it should too.

1 Like

Better than no source at all LOL As if this brick of a vehicle will move and shoot every 6seconds without the safety system from the autoloader kicking in. Gun elevation position is also a big factor nothing like that is in War Thunder at all.
The fire control system may, delay firing, require re-stabilization after loading under stress
Some variants will pause or inhibit parts of the loading cycle if gun elevation is outside allowed angles or excessive vibration or misalignment is detected
AS I said. 6 second reload is maybe under perfect conditions without moving the vehicle and having the gun in the literal perfect position for a reload. We discussed this many time with different vehicle.

Hello? Ariete, Leclerc, Leclerc, and Challenger? When was leopard mentioned??

1 Like

Not if the Abrams is so easy to kill compared to T-series tanks

1 Like

I did mention it as a vehicle but sure make it equal for every manual loading tank 100% agreed

T series are literally 1 shot 1 kill vehicles, if it takes more; you aren’t aiming properly or got jumpscared in CQC.

strange how suddenly when its the russians turn for a autoloader buff you complain about it needing to be still to be 6 seconds, but when its not chinese or russian and there flooring it i bet its fine

In theory they should, but the reality is that the autoloaders soak up so much damage while not exploding.
And then there is the magic ERA that makes rounds drift into the void.
The randomness of the post pen makes them the most annoying one.

1 Like

Please give me the information required to locate the phenomenal hallucination you’re having.

spoiler


Furthermore, the layout of these tanks means that the T-90 will receive less damage. Also, “skill issue” doesn’t account for the fact that the Abrams has an objectively larger, and therefore, easier penetration area to kill it with.

1 Like

Autoloader are ridiculous since the beginning. Just the fact that you dont need an elite crew or any crew at all for better reload speeds is insane. A Leopard without maxed crew has a 7.8 second reload and the T80 starts with 6? Thats an insane advantage especially cause you have to grind elite crew for a long time…

2 Likes

Also let me add to all this I do have the T80BVM fully grinded as well yet I do not want that change…

1 Like

I’m ok with Leopards and abrams getting a reload buff, we have the atrocious turret basket anyways. Just change the aced crew only since its realistically based on training and leave the stock crew as is. The autoloader carrousel is not considered horizontal drive, eats spall, and sometimes doesn’t explode cause of used shells. The turret basket is horizontal drive, creates spall, and always kills crew.

6 Likes

I dont understand why Gajin dont screw the realizm after all. Just make every tank have the same performance in its class. Its just not right to say on 1 tank “we have documents that shows the armor is that thin” and on the other hand they “invent” new armor values because they havent documents about it. Now the autoloader joke. either its values are documented in RL (as it is claimed years ago) or its fantasy. there shouldnt be both . Start to balance the game by fantasy values all over to have a balance finally and stop pulling a magic wand here and there

1 Like

There’s a reason why you need skill for leopards…

Let’s raise the BR of the BMPT-72, but in return we’ll improve the reload speed of all Russian vehicles.

Seriously, the company is turning the ‘Russian bias’ joke into something real…

3 Likes

Mind you they also stated they could raise it higher, but chose not to still…

1 Like