If only the Jaguar could leverage it’s superior speed to not have to frontally challenge a BMPT…
Yes, flank! Woo! Super special tactics! I definitely didn’t make the previous statement fully aware flanking was an option!
Your main autocannon will fail to kill the BMPT side on and then you’ll get blasted back to the stone age by 30mm APDS. The jaguar is also not some super mobile or super sneaky tank. It’s large and very obvious.
Also also, flanking being your ONLY option for success versus a common HARD COUNTER means ANYTIME the situation does NOT allow for you to “flank” them (Ie, just a few examples, you get a corridor map, the guy has a pair of headphones on, you run into ANOTHER BMPT on the flank (fun)) then your vehicle is useless
2 Likes
A side on BMPT is like a crab, a hard shell failing to protect it’s soft inside.
My experience in the Jaguar doesn’t seem to match yours, but that’s ok.
You cannot pen the ERA. You must blast away the ERA and THEN shoot it in the naked side armor. This is enough time for the BMPT to react and turn towards you and 1 tap you.
Only refers to forward acceleration, not the inherent problems with being a wheeled vehicle that is the size of a maus.
1 Like
At the point of a 24 game losing streak it’s either super unlucky or skill issue.
I played one game at 13.0 France yesterday and it’s fine. It can absolutely farm Russian MBTs.
2 Likes
Yes, it is completely aids to use in cqb where you cant turn in place, but overall it holds speed and accelerates well.
I like night battles. It’s not the fault of night battles, I actually perform during those.
It’s something else.
Akeron ATGMs are TRASH, unreliable, inconsistent
How is that skill issue ? I’m only 1 player out of 16 within the team. My performance counts as 1/16 of the overall team’s performance.
It can’t be lack of luck, not 24 then 18 (and even more often before) in a row. It’s a pattern, it is what happens at 12.7-13.0.
There is an obvious bias they don’t want to adress. I already said it, Russia has so much advantage at top tier, it’s not even fun to play NATO there anymore.
Your winrates at high tiers are are 50-55%, and that is including 12.7 France:
This is despite you having very low impact on the outcome of battles due to your poor K/D ratios and poor K/M ratios.
In other words: You’re being carried by far more skilled players on your team and they’ve got no issues dealing with Russian MBT’s.
You’re just cherry-picking losses to further spam ‘‘mUh rUsSiAn bIaS’’ complaint posts on this forum.
This should be end of thread.
3 Likes
And that is why NATO looses 8 out of 10 12.7 GRBs against Russia, because other people carry the said games.
Impeccable logical thought right there.
You can’t say that Russia dominates when France of all nations wins more than loses if we look at your stats. Russia also doesn’t have an 80% winrate.
1 Like
They are a gambling man’s weapon.
I am a gambling man.
1 Like
All in on the zero
The answer is it depends on how many NATO mains like you in the team, if it’s more than 5 then expect 19/20 match lost bro
1 Like
So I just happened to be in hundreds of games with NATO mains being like me, and that’s why they’re lost everytime, right
It seems normal, NATO mains breeds like the rabbits bro even at the forum they are overpopulated, they also multiply like rats on WT reddit. Thanos definitely needs to snap his finger to reduce them to half bro it’s already a deadly cycle where you would find 4-5 NATO mains with skill issue turn every threads into one tight little circlejerk of 0.6 KD experts validating each other.
Like horeshet bro do you know how lame that look? Like a NATO mains starts a party where facts and skills ain’t invited, everyone agrees but everyone still awful at the game lol
1 Like