why?
Why? Both main land China and Taiwan claim to be the legitimate Gov. of ONE CHINA, the only controversy is Gaijin not giving the option for the Taiwanese flag on the China tree.
1 Like
I had a feeling this was gonna be asked sooner rather than later
Could it? Maybe.
Should it? NO!
I don’t think it will, why would they implement a subtree for such a massive tree? Where could you even put this thing in? The Soviet tree is already quite saturated they don’t need any subtrees I argue.
1 Like
I believe you mean the T-90 Bishima.
They can actually get one that doesn’t require being captured, the Object 478BEM1.
Only Australian vehicle in the USA is the M1A1 AIM.
The main issue I have with the USSR getting a subtree is it’s size. Take a look at the Indian or Romanian vehicles for example, mostly copy paste outside of premiums or events.
J-22 was manufactured in Yugoslavia way before it’s collapse, so it should be added with the Yugoslavian flag.
In the game has a modern Serbian modification.
Fair.
It could very well be a “one off” vehicle for USSR just like they received some from Czechia and Kazakhstan.
Gaijin has not broken any rules.
Australia was announced to be going to Britain within the last year.
Not as a sub-tree, but as a general rule.
So now they are.
You’ll never get Gaijin to stop caring.
You’ll never get them to break their rules.
Of course they didn’t break their rules. They just rewrite. Silly goose. Like how they said no top-tier premiums. Then nothing in the prem tree being better than the normal tree.
They never broke it, because they rewrote it.
Jugoslavia was always between the power blocks. No soviet puppet ally like the others.
Australia so far was only going where Gaijin seemed it’s most applicable, same wording and often said alongsixe Canada. So they were officially split until now.
That said, this just puts confirmed split nations back at the same level as unconfirmed split nations, meaning they can all eventually get a fixed home like Australia got now. I’d say that’s a good thing.
@dovah4
They changed the Australian decision almost if not over half a year ago.
Not today, not last week.
They gave us plenty of warning.
No rules have changed either, all that changed is Australia’s placement.
& yeah, because the American M1A1 AIM is a squadron vehicle, it’s going to stay.
Japan/Indonesia getting the Rafale, sure.
Israel/Greece getting it, I can get past it.
UK/India getting it, I’ll survive.
But USSR? I’d start the 3rd impact
1 Like
Peak Evangelion reference
1 Like
Always o7
1 Like
I don’t really care about their placement of Aussies. Just that it seemed haphazard as we get Aussue stuff then they get Aussie stuff too, didn’t know who had priority.
They rewrite their rules all the time. From “what sources are required” to their treatment of premiums.
Whole company is a clownshow anyway. At least dress it up pretty when they bend us over and make some BS statement. Not just try and sly hand it. This is stuff I see seedy telecom companies pull.
@dovah4
The only rule change for premiums was done over 4 years ago.
It was one, singular rule change.
Source material rules for bug reports has never changed.