You expect me to read their minds for you?
so when can chieftain get its proper reload?
And when chan Challenger 1/2 / Shir 2 get their proper ready rack count?
4 Likes
I mean the leclerc has 8°…thats 1° more than a t90m…as a tradeoff you get a turret that gets penned at around 50% of its frontal area by top tier rounds and one of the worst rounds at top tier…
But yay…2kph more max speed great…ill use that for headless rushes where i will run into a t80/90 or uparmored leo that can just 3rd person me basically anywhere while i have to aim for weakspots and THEN pray that this absolutely lousy ofl f2 decides to do something meaningful…or just doesnt hit ammo at a lfp shot or not take out the breech because of conveniently added trunnions…like literally every shot at a weakspot of russian tanks (at least frontally) is a dice roll…especially with that round. I even managed to shoot at the driver port of a t90m with it, it killed the driver went through the whole tank, took out the engine but nothing else…so much to adding internal modules to reward crippling shots. i just stood still in disbelief and accepted my fate like wtf are you supposed to do in those situations? send a prayer to rng god first? just pop smoke and not shoot because you already know the outcome will be completely random?
1 Like
I guess so at this point XD
Maybe that’s why I only get uptiers?
MAYBE BECAUSE LITERALLY RUSSIAN TANKS BENEFITS THE LESS FROM BUYING THEM? WHILE NATO TANKS MUST GET SUCH TRAINING TO GET A SLIGHT EDGE? LMAO.
You just proved Vince’s point all along!
3 Likes
I see there BR’s slightly going up for the T-64/T-80, and late Chinese variants
Where has the swing device gone?
They’re propped entirety by said reload, and even then, it doesn’t overcome just butchered the mobility and how paper thin the armor is.
The actual, sustainable RoF is 3,5s. It wouldn’t be such a bad buff.
Trust me bro :)
T80b is still isnt 6.0 rn its 7.0…
WEE NEED THE OPLOT ERA FIXED
BUT THIS IS FUCKIN MINT UPDATE / BUFF HELLYA
2 Likes
Have you tried to PM the admin? It appears to me like a last minute decision to nerf the already strong t64b rather than an honest mistake…
The t72 is mostly fine, as far MZ They didn’t do any research, they just took a well known cyclogram at face value, which is something everyone at pushed this buff also does, there is no other piece of evidence on any MZ equipped tank that give a number anywhere near 6.0 seconds, you will never see a video portraying such a fast reload time either, neither for t80s nor t64s.
lol. You do realize I play nato tanks too right? And if I can preform as well as I do in them without expert crews that’s telling.
But go ahead, put words in my mouth
Because it really isn’t an historical change, they just think it’s appropriate to buff them now. The cyclogram is easily found on the internet, as far as the t72 there is simply enough ambiguity that they can finagle a 7 second reload time.
The MZ cyclogram on the other hand is the one and only piece of evidence you will ever find on a 6 second reload time, every other piece of evidence will report an higher number. Not the mention all the concrete evidence on the matter it isn’t exactly hard to find videos from the fighting compartments of MZ tanks.
3 Likes
leopard becomes a joker
So have to now Ace all my NATO tanks to retain my reload advantage, great. Nice way to make more money snail.
1 Like
Due to last night’s update, it seems that the T80s in Tank Cemetery were repaired overnight. Yesterday, my game match was like the 1980s, with a continuous stream of steel from the Soviet Union.
Anyway, 99A and VT4 have finally received some strengthening
1 Like
I mean it’s in the operators manual for the tank, along with an explanation that the hydraulic motor that drives the autoloader has a valve that can be opened to achieve maximum reload speed.
From what I can gather from the manual, 6 seconds is likely the maximum possible speed, not the standard operating speed as running it like that would cause damage after a while.
1 Like
I mean in theory all chinese tanks should share the same autoloader so this change is completely made on Gaijin’s ‘balancing books’.
U got it the wrong way round. The B version seen in the parade back in September actually lacks APS, the one with APS is an unverified, we suspect is in service tank. We might call it 99A-2 but there is no known official designation.
It’s not like NATO loaders won’t drop the ball at all, u are depicting a side that we do not want in the game. ALL systems will fail, not just the autoloader and I do not want an engine failure halfway through an ARB. Also repair times are… what? u mean it takes 40 s to repair the breech? It would take a new one IRL and that destroys the realism argument altogether.
I feel like Italy is worse than China since China does have the abrams and t84.
The argument existed long ago and long before the Thai VT-4 sale. We’ve seen various proof the Chinese autoloaders can do 6.7 seconds.
Also why add the VT-4 anyway. Just making them suffer.