Since when? I’ve never seen a Sep2 with one
All that remains is to increase the reverse speed of all T-80 and T-90 tanks to 15 km/h, make the gun depression angle to 7 degrees and the job is done.
Almost a million. My bad. Still a lot to have to get.
Ahem which requires an insane amount of time and luck to get for free, or GE. Which I already said. So. Y’know.
1 Like
The Abrams are just awful. They just don’t have enough armor, they don’t even have enough armor in their necks, their Leopards are punching through there. There is absolutely zero armor on the sides of the tower, that is, all this multilayer armor in the sides of the tower is shot through at any angle, there is no lining. A huge basket in the center that blocks all the drives, even if it is slightly yellowed. And the only advantage that Abrams had was speed, and now it’s gone, the Abrams is slower than the T80BVM. And the players for the USSR are very keen on Abrams’ performance, like he has 5 seconds of reload, but they forget that Abrams has armor like LT.
This is an Abrams with the trophy that supposedly (I can only find pictures and indirect evidence, so I’m adding the “supposedly”) too part in the defender europe 2020 exercise.
Spoiler
It has quite a bit of the features of the SEPv2 like the taller CROWS.
3 Likes
Nice change. Though I still am wondering where the 6.66 reload for the wz.1001 and mbt 2000 is
T-80BVM (2023) has been sitting in the files for a long time now with confirmed -20 km/h reverse. But you’d have to wait for the T-90M2, they promised deliveries in January 2026 but no idea if they will even come. They are cited to have T-14 transmission and Arena-M stock. It will come with Arena-M definitely since it’s been upgraded to engage FPV drones, but no clue about the transmission knowing how T-14 fared so far.
1 Like
Po angielsku bruh 🙏🙏🙏🙏
1 Like
Perhaps I’m missing something, but the reload rates don’t seem to align with what the patch notes claim?
1 Like
It’s a bug, just wait.
They won’t change the Leopard 2 reload speed.
They don’t care about the feedback being given to them.
Historical changes are mainly made when it benefits them.
7 Likes
Wouldn’t it benefit them to correct the Soviet/Russian autoloaders sooner though?
Keep in mind it’s been roughly 8 years since this issue has been initially reported.
5 Likes
They literally just did.
1 Like
mate, nato tanks are nerfed, turret basket is one of the most brutal things done to the abrams, not only is it missing so much armor, they added the turret basket to leo and abrams, not needed at all. T-series tanks are already too op, this patch wasn’t needed at all, your argument is insufficient
4 Likes
Textbook Gaijin inconsistency, simple as.
2 Likes
He says, with a 37% winrate in his T-series tank and a barely above 1-1 K/D.
4 Likes
True reload?? HSTV-L and RDFLT do NOT have “true reload” it should be 1.0 seconds, as it’s tested, check spookstons video’s too, he explains it good with proof, you have no right to talk without evidence or something backing up your arguments
6s only for non-3bm60 shells in bvm case
For once we agree, many NATO tanks have artificially inflated reload rates, which get worse if you take damage or lose crew. While Russian MBTs receive constant buffs NATO stuff gets ahistorical and absurd nerfs.
3 Likes
nice argument, oh wait… there’s none to be found…