Is the German F4 not realistic? Am I wrong asking for something I already have? Or can you shut up when a Taiwanese comes up with this question?
There are so many completely false things in this game that you don’t question, but instead question a person who asks for a fix for what he already has. Why?
I doubt you will ever get an answer from official side if you talk that way.
well yeah, China bought/licensed/copied/developed a lot of planes → it probably has the right to have a lot of planes in the game
and in the context of the f-16 MLU, no one specifically asks for a new plane, they ask to solve the dilemma in which the f-16 MLU is not an F-16 MLU in the game, so it needs to be renamed to a regular f-16a, or to make the MLU a real MLU
4 Likes
So what should I do? I really want to know.
maybe talk like you are comunicate with human beeings and stop the “i want to see your manager” Atitude ;)
1 Like
So how can I get the answer to this question? If I get mild.
bug report. Send them proof you are right with it and be nice.
Compatriots from Taiwan have already reported this issue and it has been approved, but the only feedback we got was that in June the version of this MLU was renamed and the number of CMs was cut. When we were shocked and sought answers, we were met with silence.
2 Likes
In fact, it only takes one person to stand up and say, “We decided to delay the Chinese faction getting the AIM120 and decided to change the MLU to a regular F-16A”, and Chinese players would never have complained so long. An ordinary F-16A doesn’t matter, but it can’t bear the name of the MLU to replace something better.
1 Like
dude, if its about me, the taiwan tree would be under the US ^^
2 Likes
It’s clear that China currently has the Mistral missile and Magic 2 in the game, whereas the real-life F-16 “MLU” with AIM-120 and AIM-9M has not been accurately represented.
BR 12.0 is not lacking in CAS; the Chinese faction has the JH-7A, whose efficiency is even greater than that of the F-16.
So there is no need for an ‘unrealistic’ F-16 as a transition; we can make the direct jump to BR 13.7.
humor
1 Like
No, the CAS efficiency of the JH7A is completely inferior to that of the F-16C. Do you think the JH7A’s CAS is better than the F-16C, F-16AM or F-16 OCU?
well, in reality chinese stuff might be trash but its overperforming because the game devs want your money. I personally would like to see the good US stuff with the US and the others getting some lighter vehicles.
1 Like
It’s even more laughable. But at least you’re much more honest than the hypocrites I’ve ever met. So – thank you for your comments, even though we may have differences and conflicts of opinion on the fundamentals.
1 Like
Taiwan’s Mirage 2000 has no other ground ordinance than 30mm DEFA.
And as I told you before, There are still some fans who love to see AMRAAM on their F-16 fleet.
If we can see JA37DI, then why do you need to say ‘NO’ to F-16A Block 20 MLU?
If you like your good old F-16A on 12.7BR with AIM-9L…
It will not ruined at all if Gaijin adds a JA37DI-ish version of MLU as a foldered vehicle.
And F-16A MLU has worse air to ground ordnance than J-10A and JH-7A.
There’s no reason to up-BR the F-16A MLU even more for ground RB.
The idea of a 2nd F-16A foldered with J-10A would be neat, but ultimately the J-10A has slight superiority in every way.
Taiwan has some amazing aircraft something China doesn’t have.
If an ASEAN sub trees is given to China they may get f18s also