Restore the Chinese F-16A MLU

Taiwan’s Mirage 2000 has no other ground ordinance than 30mm DEFA.


And as I told you before, There are still some fans who love to see AMRAAM on their F-16 fleet.

If we can see JA37DI, then why do you need to say ‘NO’ to F-16A Block 20 MLU?

If you like your good old F-16A on 12.7BR with AIM-9L…
It will not ruined at all if Gaijin adds a JA37DI-ish version of MLU as a foldered vehicle.

And F-16A MLU has worse air to ground ordnance than J-10A and JH-7A.
There’s no reason to up-BR the F-16A MLU even more for ground RB.

The idea of a 2nd F-16A foldered with J-10A would be neat, but ultimately the J-10A has slight superiority in every way.

Taiwan has some amazing aircraft something China doesn’t have.

If an ASEAN sub trees is given to China they may get f18s also

It won’t.

Load bearing “if”

Not a if either. it just won’t. Makes no sense to do so and shouldn’t.

Actually it has more or less the same air to ground loadout as the f16am in the French tree but it’s loadout hasn’t been touched since those weapons were added.

Even for China tech tree, J-10A is better than F-16A with AIM-120 on 13.7.
If all F-16A MLUs have AMRAAM will be very playable and historical for nations have F-16A MLU. Especially for nations with only one top BR plane.

Lineups aren’t a thing for air RB, and if making the Chinese F-16A MLU less playable is your goal, then I’m glad mine is spaded so when it’s dead due to the new BR I don’t have to play it.
Especially when I have better other F-16s to play at 13.7 in other tech trees.

I think everyone overlooked one point when discussing the issue of the F-16A MLU: the A2G ammunition of the MLU should also be similar to the top-of-the-line F-16 of other countries. Therefore, the reduction of MLU is also of great significance to the Chinese ground.

Belgian F16-AM doesn’t get hard to play just because it’s on 13.7.
Actually, all F16-AMs with no fox3 on 12.7 don’t have any playable.

1 Like

The point is there had been numerous reports submitted, acknowledged, and forwarded to developers over the past couple months yet they went on radio silence about this. And no, I would be somewhat lenient if devs are being honest and admit that they want a fake 12.7 plane to fill the tech tree, but at this point “be nice” is a completely lost cause and doesn’t contribute anything to this discussion.

1 Like

F-16AM has 120 minimum countermeasures with the option of an extra 180.
F-16A MLU has 90 max.
AM is objectively better.

No one needs to shutup when anyone ask a question. You ask a question, you open yourself to reproach.

Of course not, because they’re all US planes. Half these trees would be empty without US supplemental aircraft. Why other trees would get it and not the U.S. is a reason I think anyone would have a hard time reasoning.

Giving Germany a 2a6 and Italy a 2a7hu would be an insult to Germans. It only exists because of the Germans.

1 Like

In this game, the F-16 MLU only has 60 countermeasures (it got nerfed), but in reality, the F-16 MLU has 120 countermeasures, the same as the F-16C.
Resource: https://youtu.be/fAJZPh5kXEI?si=AnjiFI_fVbObV2qH
IMG_4239
Even after the F-16 MLU is adjusted to the real-life data, I would still choose to play the F-15E instead of the F-16 MLU.

1 Like

I’m sorry about that. I was very emotional. But I still stand by my view: the F-16A MLU repair is something we deserve, it doesn’t matter what country. Similarly, I hate the so-called “contentment theory”, I get what I should get, why should I “contentment”? If Germany or any other country wants more then please do it yourself instead of coming to the posts of other countries with weird rebuttals.

1 Like

According to this theory, ROC’s aircraft were included in the Chinese faction and required to be repaired. Because both are “China,” even the United States itself admits. So I don’t see what’s wrong with us asking Taiwan’s F-16 MLU to be fixed (or at least tell us why), really.

1 Like

It’s supposed to have 120, that was part of the mlu package, but countermeasures are rarely helpful at top tier these days so even with 60 it would do fine.

Then the problem of F16AMLU will be the same as that of F16AJ, because Taiwan’s F16 has used AIM9M and AIM120C from the beginning, and has never used AIM9L and AIM7M, so it has become a completely false thing