Actually it has more or less the same air to ground loadout as the f16am in the French tree but it’s loadout hasn’t been touched since those weapons were added.
Even for China tech tree, J-10A is better than F-16A with AIM-120 on 13.7.
If all F-16A MLUs have AMRAAM will be very playable and historical for nations have F-16A MLU. Especially for nations with only one top BR plane.
Lineups aren’t a thing for air RB, and if making the Chinese F-16A MLU less playable is your goal, then I’m glad mine is spaded so when it’s dead due to the new BR I don’t have to play it.
Especially when I have better other F-16s to play at 13.7 in other tech trees.
I think everyone overlooked one point when discussing the issue of the F-16A MLU: the A2G ammunition of the MLU should also be similar to the top-of-the-line F-16 of other countries. Therefore, the reduction of MLU is also of great significance to the Chinese ground.
The point is there had been numerous reports submitted, acknowledged, and forwarded to developers over the past couple months yet they went on radio silence about this. And no, I would be somewhat lenient if devs are being honest and admit that they want a fake 12.7 plane to fill the tech tree, but at this point “be nice” is a completely lost cause and doesn’t contribute anything to this discussion.
No one needs to shutup when anyone ask a question. You ask a question, you open yourself to reproach.
Of course not, because they’re all US planes. Half these trees would be empty without US supplemental aircraft. Why other trees would get it and not the U.S. is a reason I think anyone would have a hard time reasoning.
Giving Germany a 2a6 and Italy a 2a7hu would be an insult to Germans. It only exists because of the Germans.
In this game, the F-16 MLU only has 60 countermeasures (it got nerfed), but in reality, the F-16 MLU has 120 countermeasures, the same as the F-16C.
Resource: https://youtu.be/fAJZPh5kXEI?si=AnjiFI_fVbObV2qH
Even after the F-16 MLU is adjusted to the real-life data, I would still choose to play the F-15E instead of the F-16 MLU.
I’m sorry about that. I was very emotional. But I still stand by my view: the F-16A MLU repair is something we deserve, it doesn’t matter what country. Similarly, I hate the so-called “contentment theory”, I get what I should get, why should I “contentment”? If Germany or any other country wants more then please do it yourself instead of coming to the posts of other countries with weird rebuttals.
According to this theory, ROC’s aircraft were included in the Chinese faction and required to be repaired. Because both are “China,” even the United States itself admits. So I don’t see what’s wrong with us asking Taiwan’s F-16 MLU to be fixed (or at least tell us why), really.
It’s supposed to have 120, that was part of the mlu package, but countermeasures are rarely helpful at top tier these days so even with 60 it would do fine.
Then the problem of F16AMLU will be the same as that of F16AJ, because Taiwan’s F16 has used AIM9M and AIM120C from the beginning, and has never used AIM9L and AIM7M, so it has become a completely false thing