It will be most likely 3 (TD)
What about the 2A7V armor reports?
4 Likes
Or that 😅
I explained it above…
And you have a better source … WHERE excatly? Im waiting…
Hi Smin, kinda off topic here, but do you know why the Merkava 3’s and 4’s have the NATO 105 reload despite being NATO 120’s with loading mechanisms similar to the Abrams? It’s been bugging me for a while and makes the tanks really hard to enjoy playing.
1 Like
Are you smin? Also you are wrong so w/e
2 Likes
and you just ignore our reports about the 2A7V’s and PSO’s D-Tech armor? and 2A7V’s Acceleration?
6 Likes
Thank you for answers, very good feedback from DEVs. I’ll go and buy some $70 vehicles
6 Likes
Problem is we provided prove that it got that internal upgrade. The internal composite was increased to the same strength as the arrowhead turret of the Leopard.
If the Leopard 2A7V gets at least equivalent armor to the Strv 122 in all matters i would be happy. But the internal UFP one should be even stronger in reality
5 Likes
These types of posts are GREAT. Even if some people might not like the contents of them it is Leagues better than no info at all.
@Stona_WT
Regarding the JAS39A. Is it possible to get info on what specific version will be in game? Like what year of modifications or the specific MS upgrade? It will make it way easier to research for bug-reports and missing features.
(Might i even ask for info on what version of the JAS39C is coming to Sweden? Will we get both a JAS39C Early and a JAS39C Late?)
3 Likes
Prove it then tough guy. The Leo was my workplace. Think i know a bit more than you… Or are you a KMW engineer and you forgot to tell us?
Better sources than the ones that are 30 years older than 2A7V’s mere conception? (Not even 2A5 was a thing back then)
Well, I don’t know, uh… probably any of the numerous articles and reports backed up by the Bundeswehr and actual experts and people who participated in 2A7V’s program development that have been used on the several bug reports.
And even then, forget about internal armour; WHY IS 2A7V’s ADD-ON PLATE 30% WEAKER THAN 122’s?
8 Likes
Any decisions made about the internal composites of the Leopard 2A7V?
2 Likes
Hello. How will we stop the planes you just added to the game with such insufficient air defense systems?
1 Like
@Smin1080p I’m glad to see that Spall lining is coming to a lot of tanks now, but given that reports were passed and acknowledged about Chinese ta ks also have spall liners, can we also expect to see them this patch drop? Or will we have to wait for some post patch update?
Also is the VT-4 is a new tank coming, so are the devs able to give it Spall liners in time as well?
2 Likes
Or even the external ones.
WHY IS 2A7V’s ADD-ON PLATE 30% WEAKER THAN 122’s!?
3 Likes
This is all the news we currently have to share on what tanks will have them for now. As we said, reports are still being accepted and taken under review on them
2 Likes
Yes internal from B hull to C hull plus External armour (its AMAP these days guys. mexas was the predecessor technology (2min of google))
Yeah, I really don’t understand the 0.825x modifier that was put in place, ESPICALLY when the devs justified it with a SELF-MADE EXCEL SHEET
3 Likes