I don’t know, it’s fighting against the XM-1 for worst top tier premium in the game. That’s a hard fight. Both are tremendously garbage. XM1 even worse now as if it wasn’t bad enough before after the M735 nerf.
So the significantly older and worse Ctech armor was used instead of Dtech, to protect against moderm threaths?
Is there any source that backs Ctech and denies Dtech? Or is it you assuming it based on what exactly?
Wouldn’t it be better to state it on, rather big topic, like the promised “upamored Leopard”, you gave us back with sons of attila, similar to how it has been done with DU inserts or the challenger 2, instead of not mentioning it at all, untill directly asked about it?
Just seems like you are ignorig it, to the community. Doesn’t help, that the history of adding wrongly modelled tanks and ignoring feedback on it isn’t uncommon
Not about spall liners
AHEAD is still a broken mess as it’s implemented
The ammo being set a fire kills the gunner
Afaik the armor scheme is still wrong (not 100% sure however)
Any news on XM-1 and Type 16 (FPS) regarding their only viable shell, M735? Will the penetration values get fixed since you admitted the sources were misrepresented and the changes were done mistakenly? @Stona_WT
I don’t quite remember where and how. Gaijin put out an apology article around that time in which they clarified that armor values are not used as a balancing factor, which means Gaijin must switch on the realistic armor mode for the Merkava 4 series.
Sorry to bug you, but will we ever see anything regarding the numerous reports about the Leclerc’s spall liner/armor? All of them to my knowledge have been acknowledged, and we are pretty desperate to hear if anything in them will be acted on to improve the Leclercs.
It’s good to see potential changes for the Challenger 2/3’s and Abrams be brought up, but we are still wondering if anything will happen to the Leclercs.
Prove this statement.
I doubt it
Would very much like to see this fixed
Excuse me.
It’s the same blog but a little different from the Russian version. The Russian version has a picture of CR1 with spall liner added.
Thanks.
ok buddy
I think it would be a lot of love to give the event IDS Marineflieger any weapons that get added to the nominally identical pack premium, even if it raises the BR. The Komorans are kind of gimmicks, seeing as the Marine aircraft in real life could carry anything the other IDS jets could.
It would be a great value-add for the event vehicle, like how the Kfir C.2 got Python 3s.
If you play the game, you’d already know that 12.7 is not enough. 13.0 is not enough. 13.3 should be the bare minimum for Su27. I don’t know what you have to internally discuss. Just do it! Just decompress it already. Give us a proper Christmas gift.
No, people must suffer enough thru 10-11br to go buy premiums and end this hell faster
It is bad but 70$ is a 70$
cause add a A type first can make you grind another plane before you get the C type
Launch parameters matter alot in the game.
The higher you go, the less dense the air becomes thus the missile experiences less drag. The faster you go, the higher initial speed of the missile is and it reaches maximum speed on less fuel giving it higher range.
Managed 58km kill with the Mig 29 - 27ER. Was going 12km alt, mach 1,5. Guy didn’t maneuver, he was going full AB straight towards me. But usually I just launch at 30km distance, 5500km alt (to stay under cons) at mach 1,3. Very hight POK unless the bandit goes cold.
With AIM-7M/F my record is 28km kill and that was before the Sparrows started acting up all weird and F-16 could hold a lock for more than 5 seconds. Launching a Sparrow nowadays at more than 12km dist is a waste of a missile.