This should have been done before the release of the update. The dev server showed us that many things were still not fixed and corrected. The release should at least have been pushed back to another week and with another dev server during this week. It is very clear that this update was not ready to be released today.
1 Like
Then why did they decided to release this uptade despite most of the new additions wasnt ready?
İnstead of finishing and releasing proper uptade they decided to rush it and made community so pissed.
The CR3 is a new vehicle which was meant to have armour values copied from the other CR2s. Yet somehow this new vehicle has made it to the live version of the game with 100mm less protection?
I don’t really understand how GJN can make these kinds of mistakes unless it is intentional.
5 Likes
Why was this update released at all this week when all of the NATO vehicles are not getting what they should get and thus making them artificially weaker to the OP t90m?!?I doubt we will ever see this situation the other way around.Soviet vehicles get released always either on point or OP but never in the lacking state NATO vehicles do.We all know by this point that this company is biased but you dont even try to hide it anymore it seems.Are the devs being held at gun point by someone from the MoD so that russian crap is always the best?
1 Like
check this
sorry to ping but @Smin1080p is there any excuse that VT4A1’s armor was been buffed from DEV to MBT2000’s level？
I was looking forward to this update, I really was…
Instead I came across:
-Challenger 3 having 100+mm less KE on the turret cheeks than Challenger 2 despite being the same composition except even more angled.
-No Challenger 2/3 armor corrections.
-2019 Leopard 2A7V still having worse hull armor than 1997 Strv 122.
-M1A2 SEP and SEPv2 still having the export Swedish trials M1A2 armor (including 1979’s M1 hull).
-No Leclerc armor, rate of fire or shell fixes, changes or spall liners.
-No Merkava Mk.4 armor fixes spall liners.
22 Likes
Dont forget they didnt give spall liners to Merkava4’s,Leclerc’s and Abrams while ignoring other bug reports.
But hey we got T-90M so we should be fine right?
2 Likes
Sadly it has to be said. Rushed update
4 Likes
The major update has never brought me such a profound sense of disappointment before.
If you’re not ready, then why release it?
Christmas is still two weeks away, isn’t there still time?
2 Likes
Rushed? That’s a massive understatement. Every single NATO vehicle is broken and most likely will be left in this broken, nerfed to the ground state
6 Likes
And here i thought my only reason to be angry was to getting Gripen A into Swedish tree.
Oh boy i was so naive, Gaijin always finds a new ways to piss this community even more.
*640, we can get penned frontally by dm53 from 500 meters
it got even heavier right?
yep
The normal updates are rushed out.
This update is like GJN took the morning after pill to get it out of their system asap.
Absolutely 0 changes regarding Leclercs with this update…
Can we AT LEAST get some sort of confirmation that changes for the Leclercs in specific are being looked at?
You’ve given this type of confirmation for Challenger 2/3’s and M1A2 SepV2, but when it comes to asking if attention is even being given to Leclercs it seems we just get completely ignored.
2 Likes
no they didn’t, they just said they are looking into it.
which to be honest is probably Gaijinese for “No”
4 Likes
Is the magnification of the F16C‘s pod not installed on the official server, a bug or intentional?
1 Like
They’ve brought it up and talked about looking at changes regarding both the Chally 2/3 and SepV2.
Leclercs and Arietes haven’t been mentioned once.
2 Likes