Why should the weight of China’s F-5E be increased? Does it perform well in battles?
1 Like
Kurnass 2000’s air RB BR is still not noticed and not balanced lol, 12.3 lmao
2 Likes
well spoken!
strv 103 C 9.0 → 8.7
so strv 103 C is op i guess
the tam, of40, x803, m60 tts, leo a1, clas 3 p, 279, bmp3, the chinese 9.0 gen 2 termal gang are just as capable and srong as one as it
btw the japz.k a2 / and the sk-105 a2 are 8.7 to with more tecnologies
4 Likes
Vextra 105 should receive F2 instead of G2…
1 Like
this is happening probably because guided missle are orrible to use
Why people post further BR suggestions in this thread?
A) gaijin already collected feedback
B) gaijin already decided to ignore 99% of said feedback
This is only their “response” to “collected feedback”, but i am left to wonder why even ask for players opinion when 99% is ignored (beside the obviouss - keeping up the facade that feedback means something).
14 Likes
I think it looks fine
its not like crazy good but it does have some
good changes
81c BR is scuffed tho
1 Like
Second seeker mode is so useful that you can only use it in 1 match out of 20 because the vast majority of the map is cloudy, making it impossible to act and even search effectively for planes.
the only thing this AA is good at is killing the drones
9 Likes
Pretty sure they outrun almost all subsonic planes; I think they fear of them being untouchable and being too good at farming. They aren’t good though overall because the insane power disparity from 9.0 to 9.3 and 9.3 to 9.7. I used the premium one which can defend itself on its way to bases with nords and still had a rough time fighting any 9.3+
Ah so we can say its like dm33?
Yeah, one whole tank to be in the linup lmfao
what are you on drugs there? One tank and one spaa without the ability to hit ground targets in any way is that a lineup for you?
5 Likes
Why would you up the AMX and especially the AMX A1A in Ground? They are useless in AirRB and feature rather poor flight performance. The AMX A1A is now completely obsolete due to it sharing the same BR with a Tornado with Paveways.
3 Likes
Type 81 at 11.7 is crazy. Your so called “statistics” are whacko. It’s only good against high flying threats. Once the target decides to sniff the ground even a little bit, it becomes useless
4 Likes
I liked the VEXTRA beforehand aswell and while it did take me a while to spade it, its performance didn’t dissappoint me aside from the gun. But the improved shell definitely will be a huge buff for it, because it really struggled in frontal penetrations.
1 Like
Streal-10 is still outclassed by both 2S6 which is only 0.4 higer and OSA-AKM at same BR with Streal-10 being worse in almost ever way, i would sugest lowering Strela-10 to 10.0 so it doesn’t have to face planes with weapon range past 10km which it has not chance to enage or at least giving it its pasive radar 9S16 Flat Box-B which is modeled on vehicle in game
Its actually cringe to not move it up in both. The PZH2k is waaaay under BR. Seen it up in 10.0+ still doing numbers. Needs to be 8.3 minimum for GRB imho.
They could move the rest of the lineup to 11.7 too for the same reason given for the TKX.
Why did you raise the BR of the F-4 Phantom II? It already spent most of its battles against the Pantsir, and now it will 100% hit it, and what should it do with it? But you did not touch the Pantsir S1 that you were asked about. Why is the Pantsir S1 at 12.0? It is several times more powerful than any SAM, what is the balance? Why should a Phantom from the 60s fight against a SAM from 2012?
You mean the tank we see once a year because only 50 people have it ?