Genuinely was waiting to use the Super Etendard with the Leopard 2a4 but now its pointless af xD its 11.0, its dead for GRB and in ARB just use the mirage 3E which is better for the BR.
seeing as France jumps straight to 12.0 from 10.7… which is also another pointless tank but I digress.
You can just use the best ground attackers for france in the mirage 2k and the damn rafale… why bother with the etendard. unless you want to uptier the 2a4 ,vextra nd amx40
How good or bad the Type 90 might be is irrelevant to the point that the Type 81C is just an improved Strela and barley justified being at 11.3 and that Gaijins claim that putting 1 tank at 11.7 with it qualifies as a “line up” is a complete load of bull. AND that they destroyed one of the few decent line ups Japan had to do it is salt in the wound.
This must be how UK mains feel…
Type 90 is faster by 3 kph forward and a higher acceleration.
TKX(p)
Both are incredibly fast, but personally i like the TKX better, because of the zoom and the reverse gearbox. Since i play GFAB, and rarely use thermals and can’t really comment on that difference.
type 90 is also 3hp/ton faster which is much more noticeable than having more than 34km\h reverse speed
Ive got Uk top tier, and japan, believe me its ridiculous, look at the shir 2 at 10.0 now iwth a 9.0 dart -.-
Im well aware of the type 81 being shifted up is ridiculous, as it is totally unwarranted. Its a fantastic SPAA, if they fly within range, at 11.7 youre up against F15E/I and 16C’s as well as grips etc. They all can sit outwith your range and just drop hell.
Ill say this, the type 81 should stay 11.3 and the Type 90s shift up to 11.7
Type 90 also has more protection around the tank rather than two specific parts, one on the turret and hull.
The Type 90 also as a nicer profile as the TKX (P) has a longer turret etc.
People make a song and dance of thermals on here, but the fact is the magnification is handier, the TKX (P) has gen 2 thermals, but if you use them to spot, then turn off to fire it really doesnt matter much.
Overall the TKX (P) is a sidegrade to the type 90s, its not better or worse, it does some things marginally better and others marginally worse.
Why one moves up and not the other makes no sense.
unless its due to the Type 90s being spammed and TKX (P) being a TT tank who knows
I know, that is why i started faster acceleration, should have specified 29.7 compared to 27 hp/t.
Most people see the “Fuji” anyway, the regular TT type 90 and tkx are a pain stock, since the JM33 is a tier 3 mod.
I use both a flanker/ ambusher, since in my experience they can’t take a hit. Also if the turret bustle gets hit and you survive, it takes forever to refill the ready rack. Mainly because GFAB is such a target rich environment. 😋
Oh im aware ive got them all, just not the fuji
They can take a hit now adays the extra modules helps a bunch with it.
I dont play on GFAB but in RB the thing on a cap repairs and reloads fast enough
It’s a 120mm… vs a 105mm yes the 105 APHE is more forgiving, but they are both excellent rounds
This is a super biased statement…
The KV-1B benefits from not seeing things like stuerer Emil’s, Pz. 4s etc.
The Pz. 4 can easily kill a KV-1E, and easily bounce its shots with the add on tracks.
The KV-1B faces medium T-34s, and heavy tanks, that only at 4.7 and above can really kill it in the Soviet tree, unless you talk tank destroyers.
Its also his one of his most played vehicles, if you thought my KV-1A was played a lot he puts me to shame lol.
I can’t see it rn lol. I’m at college waiting for the prof. To walk in
Why did you group the T-55’s and T-62’s like this:
And not like this:
Wouldnt that make a lot more sense, considering the BR changes. Also, its done that way for the Rooikat/Olifant folders
T-62’s placement will be changed as part of the major update, not as part of BR changes, it was stated in the end of the BR changes table.
Oh look, it’s a KV1B abuser with 1k+ games.
Poor poor KV-1B tears even at 4.3 its gonna be good lol
Its like they dont even play the game. There is no need to have an AMX13 be at the same BR as a T92 when the T92 has the same reload speed and doesnt suffer from an auto loader running out. Plus the same mobility and a 50 cal.
Ngl I’m amazed the Churchill VIII is still at 4.7, that thing has been the name of my existence today. And I realized pretty much there’s a lot of guns that cannot frontally pen it.
It also has a worse gun than the KV-1E/B(75mm AP is pathetically bad), while also being less mobile (by a large margin).
You could argue that it could go down to 4.3.
imagine genuinely thinking tigers are unbalanced when they have sod all armour and their gun (despite how overperforming APHE is) is pretty meh when its facing 17pdr and similar
Im with you on turm 3 tho but whining about USA heavies at tat BR is just funny
the 76mm one? nah its genuinely fine at 7.0, things like the M109, M44, Pzh2000 and all other spgs need moving the hell away from ww2 tho
