I think giving out objective comparisons in form of pros/cons won’t help much, as many people weigh features differently so you once again introduce subjectivity.
I’m sure you already seen many of those: Reload speed doesn’t matter because of reasons. Gun handling doesn’t matter because of reasons.
etc.
If a vehicle in question has both pros and cons when compared to contemporaries, it’d still be open to subjective interpretation, as I said above.
T95E1 is fine for 8.3 To be quite honest but, has a great turret traverse, good mobility, surprisingly nice armour and a fantastic gun for its BR, its only lacking a stab
@Stona_WT Any movement on the FV4030/3 getting the L23A1 round? seeing as now it can go up against tanks like the ZTZ 99 II and III, or T90A which are firing rounds like 3bm60 and DCT10-125? and are layered in composites.
Mind you the Shir 2 can be hull penetrated by even the 3BM25 of the T55A
EDIT, On top of this, there is no 10.0 lineup to use the Shir 2 tank in, which either means taking it to an even higher BR at 10.3 or 10.7 over BRing it.
or bringing the 9.3’s of britain up to 10.0 which as two whole BR steps above them.
1930s… “Ultra modern.”
The only difference is 7.7 gives that 1930s howitzer technology laser range finders, and you still need to hit smaller weakspots than APFSDS vs T-90M, or give up in some cases [Ferdinand, Jagdtiger].