Im sorry son, the abrams is a fine tank, even im positive in all of them bar the base M1 and that was my first 10.0 tank.
the CR2 can get one tapped through the LFP by 2.3 tanks man, should it ? god no.
The abrams are still sitting behind the leopards as contenders for the best top tiers.
The Melons who leave with one death are a HUGE issue for USA at top tier, to act as if its not is ridiculous.
Just like to point out that it really isn’t very big. It’s the same size as the original turret ring, but underneath it.
Edit: Plus, now they kinda have to model those autoloaders better.
The Abrams is not fine.
Exposed turret ring.
Abrams hull armor is from the 80’s (literally nothing changed when it comes to hull armor since the base M1)
Fighting against superior tanks most of the time.
I don’t know how do you define fine, but when it comes to Abrams it’s totally not fine at all.
Hello and sorry for using a translation program, but my question is important because I have been playing this game for about 10 years and this update is unfortunately the worst. Why if the driver is hit from the side in the Abrams tank, the turret is disabled due to shrapnel? This cannot be realistic, and if it is, it is more harmful to the game than beneficial. Where is this game in the end characterized by realism, and this is a good thing, but some things will harm the game more than they benefit, such as the Abrams or Leopard tank, when any penetration occurs at the engine, even not at the driver, it is sufficient to disable the turret. Where is the modification that you said would be made so that the part that is disabled would be only the upper part and the base of the basket? Why was this part not modified before the update was released? Thank you and sorry that I mention you @Smin1080p_WT It is the first time, but really this is very sad for me
Imo abrams is fine. In terms of basket nothin rly changed (compared to this hydraulic cable).
Ofc they did it very very unfair that it only affected 2 tanks. So yeah in this terms its not fine
Shock horror young man,
CR2 - completely broken models, tanks also got the same turret ring weak points, armour has been proven to under performing.
Merkavas - Armour has been proven multiple times to be horribly incorrect , as well as reload times and FCS systems.
Arietes - need I state this?
Leclercs - armour has been proven countless times to be incorrect sa well as the fact that the reload is not correct.
even the T80s have incorrect models and reloads.
Type 10? armour is incorrect, reload has been proven albiet it would be unablanced, to be incorrect.
The abrams still has the same breaach weak point every other tree does.
the abrams as the 2nd best round in game, technically the best out of the L/44 caliber cannons.
5 second reload.
Incredible mobility.
and fantastic profile.
Yes it has issues such as @SPANISH_AVENGER has a list of,
off the top of my nut I remember fuel tank linings being an issue,
turret ring is a hot topic same as the supposed DU hull slots.
However to act like the abrams is a tank that is suffering or is not on the better end of spectrum is just straight up nonsensical.
now the turret baskets should get added to the relevant tanks, e.g CR3, Type 90s I believe also have them, Chieftains as well if im not mistaken.
etc etc.
The fact they got added to only two tanks is worth complaining about.
The actual effect they have in game is a non issue and people just want to cry about it.
Turret baskets getting me pwned again and again. I don’t…how can the turret jam with every single non lethal hit?
The fact that this change only was made to some vehicles make them incredibly annoying to play… Time to avoid Abrams… (already avoiding leopards due to the depression nerf towards the rear)
Ah yes, not requiring any aim in order to cripple/ one shot someone and making the game more akin to COD(whoever shoots first wins regardless of skill) definitely would be a non issue🙄
This addiction is pretty much the worst thing ever added to the game, everyone who says otherwise is either delusional or just doesnt play the metapard/abrams enough.
(Btw this “feature” had a 81%-19% on the pool for not adding it in the first place)
Voted no.
But after playing between both abrams and leopard 2s about 20 games realise its really not that big a deal.
It doesnt though.
The shots ive been hit that would disable the turret ring would be shots that would of disabled it before the turret basket.
The abrams for example its safer to just aim for the turret ring (an issue of its own) and one tap the whole crew, not try aim for an angled shot into the hull.
Which in my abrams i still survived.
Turret basket down. Over 30 secs repair time.
Moved like 100 ingame meters…turret basket again down. Its seems it always somehow gets hit, even a spall fragment is sufficient to prevent you shoting back.
I really hate this change. Especially since the Leopard basket and especially the floor have no elements which somehow contribute to turret traverse. I linked some pics of the basket floor espeially and there is nothing than a thin plate for the crew to stand upon. The turret drive is a small electric drive with a power cable leading to it from below. The basket isn’t the turret drive. Certainly not the floor. Ingame somehow the whole basket is a turret drive??
This needs to be reversed.
Well, if your driving 40 mph in an abrams, and your reloading, you should have random jitters in load time slowing down, because manual load, oh, he fumbled the round, blast door for the ammo was open too, and it was struck, while tank burnt down.
An ace crew repair for a t-series auto loader is about 36 secs.
You should count yourself lucky yours is only 30 secs.
Im constantly playing Type-10’s and Leclerc while fighting against at the same time.
Autoloader increased their survivability a lot.
Btw Sorry for late reply.
Why I’m not surprised?
Tbh im not happy with this, especially since they added turret basket to both Abrams and Leo’s.
But you are celebrating when they added destructible autoloader modules on tanks that isn’t your favorite?
