its not an awful map, and there are plenty that i’d remove before Sweden (Mozdok, Ardennes (the spawn-spawn sniping one), 50% of Conquest Variants, etc)
the Map certainly has something to offer, especially at lower BRs, but is still fine at some higher BRs, but at top tier (as per 80% of maps) it is awful to have and is too cramped
Sweden is one of the very few urban maps I actually don’t mind, hahah.
It’s not tiny and claustrophobic like other urban maps- it’s larger, not as cramped, has lots of open areas and parks, plazas, long and wide streets, etc.
Yes. Me.
Excellent city map.
If thought you ment the nation for a second.
Personally I have no stake in this as I barely get the map and feel neutral about it.
I thought the nation
I like it me, very fun map, the only thing i dislike about it is that its a bit difficult to play AA sometimes if you’re not on the edges of the map due to all the buildings.
I still remember someone wanting both Sweden and Italy to be German subtrees because they operated German tanks which was hilarious beyond belief.
its a good/decent map more fitted to lower br games and should be only available there
Im not in favor of outright removing maps ( I miss White Rock fortress more than you can imagine) but the system of only having one ban means I just leave when I get bad maps. 4 bans would be better, but then “variants” of the same map exist making this a pointless exercise. Til then, I will simply leave instead of wasting my time with terrible maps.
I like sweden at low tiers somewhat, but past 6.7 its an awful “who peeks first” or “who can hide better”