Remove Stock Belt from KBA B02/CN25 M811

  • Replace the stock belt with full APDS
  • Keep the 1/3 APDS belt as is
0 voters

Currently, the stock belt for the 25mm autocannon found on the VBCI, VBC (PT2), Dardo, and Freccia is extremely weak.

Despite these autocannons having a very high rate of fire, they start out with a stock belt with 1 APDS round and 2 HEI-T shells. This means 2/3rds of your round are complete toilet paper.

Now that may sound bad on its own, but also consider the fact that the APDS shell has a meager 80mm of penetration at maximum.

What is worse is the shell shattering effect. It makes it essentially impossible to kill even light tanks with the belt. Seriously, I’ve struggled to kill Bradleys by hitting them in the turret. Any kind of angle and your round ceases to exist.

Keep in mind that the VBCI and VBC (PT2) only have their autocannons and thus have no other way to fight an enemy. Because of this, you are basically forced to cap points until you get the full APDS belt and parts unlocked.

What I propose is simply removing this belt and replacing it with the full M791 APDS belt stock, and moving the PMB 090 APFSDS belt up to Tier III, at the very least for the VBCI and VBC (PT2).

7 Likes

Would also add the Type 87 RCV is cursed with this problem, while also lacking the stabilizer the VBCs have.

It’s just standard stock grind conditions, nothing special. There’s no need to change it significantly.

Pretty sizable difference to have triple the time to kill of a non-stock vehicle.

Hell, at least with stock HEAT, you have some extra utility against lightly armored vehicles like IVFs/wheeled LTs. 25mm HE is a literal detriment in every situation unless you’re fighting a Chapparal.

6 Likes

The way I see it, is that with a 300 rpm (5 shots per second) it isn’t overly demanding to have 1/3rd APDS as the default belt. Many light tanks don’t even have any APDS in their default belt, just standard AP. Add on the fact that full APDS belt is either Tier I or Tier II modification, and you get the conclusion that there really is no big issue whatsoever.

2 Likes

The vehicles around Rank VI that use AP as their default belt also have ATGMs to compensate for the lack of firepower from the autocannon.

Furthermore, light tanks that use the 30mm Bushmaster, like the VCC 80/30, CV9030FIN or the ICV (P) get full APDS belts stock while being around the same BR and having a more powerful gun.

So I’d say it’s fair enough that those with ATGMs start off with only AP.
I would say it’s also fair enough that 30mm vehicles with 200 RPM get access to a full APDS belt due to how shit their DPS is already with the poor firerate.
If they had 1/3 APDS they would be almost impossible to spade effectively.

Their slightly larger caliber (hence slightly better penetration) doesn’t compensate for the much worse RPM of 200, at least for me and my experience fighting such vehicles.

The issue is that with only 1/3 rounds being APDS, your fire rate is in fact effectively lower with the 25mm than the 30mm.

The VBCI has a fire rate of 400 rds/min, but divided by three that’s 133 rds/min. Meaning your fire rate is something closer to the 2S38 or Begleitpanzer (120 rds/min) than the 30mm Bushmaster (200 rds/min) while still having a weaker round.

1 Like

I guess I could understand that.

I believe 2/3 being APDS would be fair enough - effectively making it 267 RPM stock.

Actually, I just looked at their fire rates:
image

No wonder these 25mm nail gun vehicles are so good.
They’re shooting 9.3 25mm APFSDS rounds per second.
Meaning that 1/3 of a belt being APDS means 3.1 APDS rounds per second (187 RPM), which is just slightly worse than a full belt of APDS from a 30mm, which is 3.35 APDS rounds per second (201 RPM).

I think 2/3 may still be reasonable, but 1/3 isn’t nearly as bad as I intially thought, coming from your post.
Maybe 2/4 would make more sense.

133 rds/min is correct. 400/3 is 133. The CN25 fires slower than the Oerlikon KBA

Edit: to be honest I think the stat card on the VBCI is just wrong lol. It sounds exactly the same to me as the Oerlikon in test drive.

My bad, I was just thinking of the vehicles with the Oerlikon KBA.
I can agree with the VBCI getting a 2/3 APDS belt, but I’d still stick to the 2/4 or 1/3 for the ones that get the Oerlikon KBA gun.

Maybe. I can check it out with a friend.
Hold on.

Ok, so on average the gun overheated after 64 rounds (34 rounds left out of 100 round clip)
On average, that took about 10 seconds.

64 rounds / 10 sec = 6.4 rounds per sec.

6.4x60 = ~384 rounds per minute, which makes the stat card correct.

If I had a larger sample size (maybe continuous 100 rounds instead of just 64), the percentage error from my reaction time would become insignificant - so the closer it would probably be to 400rpm.

My reasoning is that if the CN25 got it there wouldn’t be much reason for the Oerlikon to not get it. But slippery slopes and all that I guess.

Even a 1:2:1:2 belt with APDS and HE-I would be fine imo but the 1:2:2 belt seems a bit unfair

It might just be because they have the same sound effect that made me think they were the same…

1 Like

Yes, which is what I was pointing towards here:

Look at it this way, these vehicles are balanced at their BRs based on their spaded performance. No other vehicle has such a massive TTK gap between stock and spaded performance. Even the water pistol that is the 20mm RH202 has a 50/50 AP/HE at worst.

Keep in mind, a fast TTK is pretty much the singular advantage tanks like the VBCs and RCV have. They have no ATGMs to fall back on, and the penetration is so mid (especially on the APDS) that you need to be able to quickly take out tanks. Otherwise many of the tanks you can frontally penetate will spray you down with their autocannons first, and stuff you can only pen in the sides/rear will have the ability to angle against you.

Also, the full APDS belt is a tier 3 mod for the RCV. Cards on the table, this is the only stock grind I’ve done with this gun, so it’s coloured my opinions on it, but I don’t want anyone to have to go through anything like that again.

1 Like