- Yes
- No
Hi all,
As we all should well know, one of the greatest aspects of this game is the fact one can customize their vehicles with all different manner of emblems and symbols within the game, it is one aspect of War Thunder that I dearly love, but there is one portion of the customisation system that is heavily restricted, and that is the roundels and insignias menu in-game. this restriction stops one from putting many of the different roundels onto certain nation’s vehicles, such as placing the New Zealand Air Force roundel, (one I am most partial to) onto any nation other than Britain and America, which simply will not do.
I believe that removing or heavily reducing this restriction from the game allowing players to place the emblems of their chosen country upon the many hundreds of unique vehicles in-game will be a great service to the player base and greatly appreciated as in games such as this, the more customization possible, the better.
I am aware that this restriction was originally brought into the game to prevent the misidentification of other players within sim battles, primarily air SB, and as I do not play air SB I can not comment too much on the impacts there, however, The vast majority of the games player base never touch SB in any form, and restricting emblems in the other game modes is redundant as all friendly players have UI bubbles above their vehicles, and any Team kills resulting in ab or rb game modes are either intentional or impossible to conduct.
I would therefore suggest that the meaningless restriction being placed on the customization of vehicles in-game with national emblems be removed, and a new system allowing for separate custom settings to be set aside for sim battles to be implemented.
any suggestions or comments on this topic would be appreciated.
(edit)
Gajin recently added an optional button under the customization of vehicles tab in settings allowing one to switch off all decals on other people’s vehicles, This completely bypasses the argument about sim battles for me, I see absolutely no reason to implement the changes requested in this post.