I have the exact sources you do. You have nothing more than I do.
The sources you have are terrible that also say that R27 (all variants) pull 40 degrees alpha at Mach 5 in which you eat right up. Believing its true!
That is wild that you actually believe that crap…
In reality, Nothing explains the ability for the missile to reach Mach 3.4 in under 7 seconds while maneuvering @ 1km altitude.
It is a 35G maximum overload missile just like the R27R.
Because it uses the same exact aerodynamics and controls. Therefore it must also inherit all of the same aerodynamic limitations as well.
The missile is only confirmed to have received a long burning motor. No relevant additional thrust. Because if it did receive any additional thrust along with the long burn motor, the missile would have to have been aerodynamically upgraded. It never did.
It is heavier. It has a larger mass. It has a longer burning motor & supposedly a “higher thrust”.
Those affect its acceleration and velocity tremendously and will have inevitable negative effect on how many gravitational forces the missile can sustain & maneuver under.
If physics needs to be explained to you once again, I don’t know what else to tell you.
What you claim is beyond the performances shown in-game and / or false entirely. Currently it underperforms most of the values shown by real world documentation. No amount of gaslighting or nonsense from you will change this.
Firstly, you are flying at a speed significantly higher than the real one.Secondly, the resistance from suspended weapons is very poorly modeled in the WT. In reality, your speed with such a set of rockets would be no more than 1150 km/h
Go educate yourself, you are too busy talking about a missile in a game you never played.
The physics of the flows of airfoils and wings at supersonic flight conditions are significantly different from those obtained in subsonic flight, which is the reason the value of the Mach number is so crucial in classifying aerodynamic flows.
In supersonic flows, the formation of shock waves and expansion waves significantly impact the performance of the wing or airfoil. For example, on the one hand, shock waves cause drag and increase the pressure on the wing’s surface. On the other hand, expansion waves arise when a supersonic flow is turned away from itself, reducing the pressure on the wing’s surface and creating lift.
Ahhahah. It’s funny considering that. That the article that you cited indicates that the streamlined body is at a certain angle of attack.It is not equal to zero.You’re trying to prove everything that an absolutely symmetrical body creates lift
You are right, they have successfully derailed and ran everyone out who came to discuss their thoughts on overperformance, why it should be removed from the Mig29.
No momentum can be generated because these two dudes who don’t play top tier have only one graph & their interpretation of it.
They have no sources on the thrust specifications. It never received additional thrust. Just a longer burning motor.
That is why it never received any aerodynamic upgrades & is still a maximum 35G overload missile just like the R27R.
The ER and R27R both share the exact same limitations. One is just heavier and burns for a longer period. The massive acceleration in game is entirely made up.
Simply settle this, provide the thrust specifications of the ER. @MiG_23M & @BBCRF
I looked at the standard table where the parameters of the carrier and the target and the height of 0.5 km were indicated. And the range fit into the video.In the video, your speed is not the same with the target, you fly faster.
