Remove KH38

So I think it can replace AGM-65D because it maintains a speed of 0.8 Mach throughout the flight to the target so this will be a reliable missile to compare with KH-38MT with a range of up to 70KM with an initial speed of Mach 2.2

image

What carried it?

Tu-2

We also have the AF-82 which is a early glide bomb which can be used on WW2 aircraft iirc
IMG_1268

Since they removed (or had it removed) the comment that annoyed me I wont throw them under the bus.
But the IS-2 discussion was in a thread in “machinery of war” about the “6.7/7.0 ground matchmaker” if you feel like giving yourself a headache reading it.

1 Like

theres also the tarzon bomb which is a guided version of the tallboy that the lancaster gets in game

sorry ur comparing a walleye and a LB 82 (early maverick) to a cruise missile with much higher range capacities, and not only that but really russia’s first fire and forget missile was KH 29-T a TV guided missile and their first fire and forget with much more range and on a better platform thna the A4E or the Hunter of all things

alright tell me what is soviet equivalent for walleye and LB 82 at 9.7

yeah yeah, tell us what is soviet equivalent for these jets at 9.7-10.7

su17 is 9.7 and has kh25s and kh29l, su25k is the strongest 10.0 attacker and has insane guided and unguided weapons that are very strong, as far as guided weapons they are more involved but more damaging than the maverick and s25O rockets are broken as fuck still.

you have GREAT cas choices most arguably better than whatever americans can bring, early maverics are usefull but theyre on garbage platforms and easily intercepted by any AA with a brain, maverics are easier to use than soviet altenatives but also less reliable as theyre slow and inaccurate.

1 Like

Remove Kh-38, remove LMUR.

enlightenment

1 Like

None are FnF and TGP on those planes is just atrocious.
Su-17 doesn’t even get flares as well.

1 Like

these are not fnf and you have to nose dive toward your enemy, even aa to deliver them

wow great logic, early maverick can easily be intercepted by AA but a nose diving Su-17 is hard to intercept.

the points still stand that you can just lob a AGM62/65 at your enemy and just fly the separate direction to avoid getting shot down. you still dont have to nose dive following your munition

remove all fnf for ground attacks, a lot of problems will be solved

just reserve fnf for AAM and SAM

This.

100% this.

They were a terrible mistake and need to be removed.

There is no shame in admitting a mistake.

Are we also going to remove a lot of the new SPAA then ?

Nah, we can actually improve them by fixing the issues with helicopters LIDwhatever and their rotor blades not showing up on radar.

Heaven forbid the ground guys get a chance to actually play. The period betweem the previous major update and this one was… amazing. That’s what it should be like all the time.

I hate CAS that much.

Thx for showing everybody that you are just a unreasonable angry guy and thats why Gajiin doesn’t listen to people here.

Meh, whatever you think, it certainly won’t keep me up at night.

CAS is atrotious in game. If you don’t have planes mowing the lawn and dropping bombs from 10ft in lower tiers, you then get to laser guided bombs in higher tiers and then fire and forget missiles in later tiers.

There is a reason people have been asking for tank only mode for literally years and there’s a reason the topic keeps coming up again and again and again and again.

1 Like

The reason is it’s always the same people whining about it and like yourself, don’t really want to have balance, you just want the game to be your way and no different.
Thats the only reason it comes back up.