Ok I ROCA should remove in the game ,change to PRC
That is easy
Has the Chinese government begun to allow a region to collude with foreign forces without incurring charges of subversion of state power?
1 Like
J-10C got its texture during the last Spearhead update I’m pretty sure.
It’s just a game; why do you care so much about politics?
1 Like
well try again ,and wait their answer
See? Just like I said.Whenever they can’t find an argument!
Please explain how I can simultaneously play the roles of: your family, the child you’re looking for, your original nation, an ally of your hypothetical enemy, and someone who can acquire the latest equipment from your rival nation?
Do we belong to the same country if all of the above conditions are met?
1 Like
Alr i am posting it then
Nice
1 Like
totally, the chinese userbase yapping about the VT4 going to Japan a few months ago showed how they despise c&p vehicles going into other tts, not its double standards when their tt gets a new addition
4 Likes
Gaijin is really just abiding by what the international community recognizes tho. You can think and say that there is a state there. But what the UN recognizes should be what gaijin upholds
Subtrees are a mistake, they literally killed all the uniqueness of major nations.
Why would someone play USA if there is Abrams, Apache and F-16 in China ?!
Why would someone play USSR if Kh-38MT the “Meta Missile” of the nation is given to Japan?!
Why would I fly Soviet HINDs if Italy has them?
Why would I play Germany if Leopards in France tree?
Strela & MiG-21 in UK tree? Are you kidding me?!!
Israel a main nation with 90% of vehicles are copy paste?! It is even worse than China!
I’m not biased to a nation against another at all, I’m just against the whole chaos and mess that happened because of the copy-paste vehicles and sub-trees spam.
6 Likes
We wouldn’t even want the Abrams or have this issue at all if gaijin made the Chinese tanks correct
1 Like
Remember! The One-China principle and the One-China policy are not the same.
If we are not a nation, then why don’t you and your government stop colluding with foreign powers? Oh! I forgot, we are of different nationalities.
The import of the M1A2T is intended to counter the ZTZ99, not to counter the M1A2 Sep v3.
2 Likes
bro, Э in Х-38МТЭ means EXPORT variant
If you keep thinking this way, I’m afraid you’ll have to quietly endure such double standards in the future.
I feel sorry for you guys if you think the Abrams is going to be made “correct”, good luck with the horizontal drive weakspot and a basket. Plus i dont remember if the export abrams has any DU plates in the cheeks so you might essentially get M1A1 protection wise.
So what does this post have to do with Japan? Isn’t it because American players are unhappy that only their vehicles have been unilaterally exported to China? So as a Chinese player, I think it is completely acceptable and reasonable to export some characteristic vehicles (such as the J7 that the US government has bought before or the J8 that has been modified in cooperation with China) to the US TT (provided that American players really want to play those) 💩）， So I don’t understand what those players who are talking about Japanese TT are really thinking. The involvement of this car should only be between American TT players and Chinese TT players. And importantly, China really has M1A2T, and the United States has also bought J7, but Japan has never obtained or operated VT4 or VN1C. This post has completely deviated, and all of this is because Japanese players who don’t know where emerged
4 Likes
M256 smoothbore main gun fire dm53 right? If my report about KE-W A2 get rejected can i protest about DM-53 for US?