There’s no point of having a conversation then
2 Likes
yes thx your understand
I’m more annoyed there’s no Thai VT-4 to go alongside with it.
4 Likes
It’s still ultimately gaijins decision. Don’t pin the blame on any one playerbase
1 Like
Su-30MKM topic is active
Canadian vehicles are assigned to the UK, US, and Germany. For example, the L2A4M(CN) is assigned to Germany. So why isn’t the M1A2T assigned to the US and placed after the M1A1 HC? Think about it, how would you distinguish which vehicle is the friendly Abrams in Simulator Battles?
- 1 Billion If the VT4 or other Chinese vehicles never entered any other country, then it wouldn’t make sense to add any foreign vehicles to China’s tech tree.
2 Likes
+1 absolutely agree this is ridiculous both on paper and on practice
Mr worldwide the tech tree
1 Like
Anywho I think the tank should stay but Japan should still be allowed it’s Thai VT-4.
Imo, tech trees and nations as a whole need a rework because this current system just keeps sparking arguments and there’s a constant contest if whether subtree or main nation vehicles fit in a tree slot.
You’re being ridiculous
This is not a problem; Leopard 2 is already widely present in the tech trees of various countries.
1 Like
“Simulator Battles”
Guys does someone have documents that prove that Taiwan did not buy KEW-A2 so that at least that round could be removed from it
1 Like
I respect your opinion. Then we’ll equip Britain with M1A2Ks, and give Germany : Poland M1A1 FEPs and M1A2 SEPv3s, making Abrams as ubiquitous as the Leopard 2.To compensate Add the Leclerc from the the UAE for US.
Will this be considered as official document for bug report?
1 Like
@HondaCivici
You are purposefully conflating functionality & playstyle with cosmetics.
Leclerc and Abrams have the same 5 second reload time, same armor, same mobility.
Claiming M1A2T is copy-paste is claiming Leclerc is copy-paste.
So you’re wrong about Leclerc and M1A2T being copy-paste, Leclerc is not copy-paste, and M1A2T is not copy-paste.
Lets try and see