I think sub nations can exist just dont get political and keep it balanced. We dont need 30 different leopards in 60 different TT.
3 Likes
That would just be pure chaos XD
1 Like
Thats what i mean lol. Sub nations can stay, just give more unique vehicles instead of the same thing over and over.
NATO tanks are much more survivable tho. That’s just a fact
2 Likes
It’s a shame that the forum doesn’t have a smiley mechanic.
☺ this? Bit small tho
“Nato tanks” the leclere and Ariete in the corner crying
1 Like
The problem was that people thought that Japan was going to get the VT-4 1, and the Chinese player base had a hissy fit over it. So why is it fair that they get a M1A2 while Japan cant get the VT-4
2 Likes
T-90 that ate 3 shell with autoloader and fuel tanks would beg to differ.
Jokes aside no tank is actually able to keep fighting after being penned by APFSDS irl. It’s just that NATO tanks have waaaay higher crew survival rates than soviet type tanks.
It’s better to make a separate thread about Su-30MKM, so it would be more visible
It’s not Russia, it’s Soviets and technically they are post soviet counties, both Russia and Ukraine, you can see other post soviet countries vehicles in the Soviet tech tree
I was just making a reference. I wasn’t talking about the game.
1 Like
This is not issule ,M1A2T rename to M1A2CN
1 Like
Being immature and seeking revenge for something that gaijin didn’t even confirm?
1 Like
I don’t want to get to politics but that’s just not something the international community and the UN agrees. This is just an objective fact
it does. that is like saying the clickbait is a unique vehicle because it has a chair on top of it. ARAT doesn’t provide any meaningful traits making them ultimately a cosmetics. To say otherwise is foolish.
Both the US and Taiwanese Abrams have identical armor. that argument means nothing.
You’re purposely conflating functionality with play-style. the Abrams and Leclers have different ways of loading, different armor, strengths, weaknesses and one has a proxy round.
The only real difference between the US and Taiwanese Abrams is it’s round. Both have nearly identical penetration, but the M829A2 weight 1kg more. Did quick tests and they appear to create nearly identical spalling.
So no, the M1A2T is a copy-paste.
2 Likes
This is just an objective fact .So rename to M1A2CN is better
Why are you being so unreasonable?
1 Like
I keep my idea ,you keep your idea.
1 Like
War Thunder is a market-oriented game. If Chinese players begin to question certain absurd rumors about the game, Gaijin will naturally take these concerns seriously and ensure they are properly addressed. Unfortunately, fairness does not exist in a market-driven environment. Moreover, the purchase of Abrams tanks by Chinese players is a mutually agreed transaction between the Chinese and American parties, which has no relevance to the potential inclusion of the VT4 in Japan’s Thai subtree of the tech tree.
3 Likes