Honest question again, if you can answer: is there anything else in the game currently “under consideration to be phased out eventually” after this? o7
3 Likes
No because they’ll just move the goalpost and say ‘actually it’s totally fine that this vehicle is staying’
1 Like
At this precise moment, nothing to speak of. Its the Ho-Ri currently.
1 Like
I’m not denying that the KH38 missile family is real I’m saying the the MT variant the one with the IR seeker isn’t as there’s literally no evidence apart from a booklet and a model not a prototype a model the only evidence (documented destruction of used missiles in modern theatres of war) this missile is from the KH38-ML which is the laser seeker you can’t keep changing the goal posts because it just keeps going back to the Russian bias conversation and on that note how are you gonna say balancing reasons for the AIM7p when just 0.7 br higher you have the SU30 premium for Russia with basically R-77 it don’t make sense
3 Likes
The M47 is actually quite solid, I enjoyed it honestly. With the Ho-Ri and the Type 99, 7.3 is a pretty good BR for japan at the moment.
2 Likes
Unlike what they thought when they added the F-16AJ, it was never actually trialed or even prototyped in the first place. They also didn’t even add the F-16AJ as it was on paper, and instead changed somethings that, thanks to “questionable technical research” don’t make any historcial sense.
It’s in the same boat as the Ho-Ri I’d say. It’s wrong even compared to paper plans and was intentionally added to fit top tier at the time. Only unlike the Ho-Ri, there’s actually very convenient replacements like the Thai F-16A OCU that would be 12.7 without AMRAAM and in reality couldn’t even use them anyways.
2 Likes
“here at gaijin we add so called copy paste vehicles to complete line ups and fill gameplay gaps”
then removes a unique vehicle that fills a gameplay gap (heavy tank destroyer with ap shells) because the gap has been filled by the japanese 109 version, great, nice, very reasonable
this makes no sense at all as there are a lot more bogus blueprint machines that were never actually build that dont even fill any gaps
still dont understand why you removed the maus you guys do know that thing was actually built(even if it was just 2) right? how about fully bringing that back?
1 Like
WIKI says 2 prototypes were built - Flakpanzer IV 3 cm Flakvierling.
How is that not enough to include in the game?
1 Like
Saying and showing are different things
When is polish tree coming? I am very excited for this tree the most
There is an open suggestion for Panther 2 which has the two proposed turrets for it.
There was also a real proposal to put the 105 in Tiger 2, but it was rejected since the loading speed would be too slow.
I’d rather they just correct the Ho-Ri Proto to the real thing.
…and also permanently remove these instead of having them come back, or have them researchable+moved to the premium/event section of tech tree with a different color but only usable in Custom Battles.
2 Likes
Gaijin has said before that it meets the “prototype” rule because the YF-16 it was based on existed.
Again, there’s nothing you can say about the AJ you can’t also say about Heavy Tank No. 6, which was merely “proposed to be shipped” at some point by Germany and the one physical example ended up fighting on the Eastern Front instead. That tank was put in game in 2016.
The real question is why is there a sale on a vic they dont want in the game
1 Like
The Maus is a real tank and it returns once every year just because is an iconic tank. Ho-Ri, Tiger II 105, R2Y2 and the other are just forgettable fever dreams. Hell, the Tiger 105 had a gun breach that interfered with the rangefinder.
If you guys want to play with made up stuff, there is another game for this (IYKYK).
1 Like
But they present in game, so they should be available
1 Like
“Remove” but leaving in game is the issue.
Still fighting removed tanks from 2019 in game so what has been achieved?
Half true, IRL it was a M1A1 and at that time Gaijin didn’t want to add a premim A1 (5 months later they added the Clickbait…)
But i think it makes sense, the KVT basically doesn’t have a fully traversible turret due to the fake fuel tanks in the back, so if it was a A1 (12.0) it wouldn’t be balanced. Maybe they could make it a M1A1 (slower but with a 120mm gun) at 11.0 with just M829, it would be better than the Regular M1 but worse than the M1A1 and IPM1.
3 Likes
Believe what you want.
I have sources that mention both the Zerstorer and the Kugle as prototypes.
They are just as “real” as the Panther F.
But all that aside - are you one of those “purists” that believe WT should be as real as possible?
Like a T50 facing a 1954 M44?
Or a Tiger 2 facing a 2S19M1 from 2000.
I really don’t get players that insist on “realism” in some aspects of the game but shrug off other non-real aspects…
3 Likes
wrong configuration
you forget about the Ro-Go heavy tank