Always has been soft power projection and since the special operation they have gone into overdrive.
you were told where you have to shoot, people literally poke all critical problems of T series in game into your face and you are still coping about winrates. just for note bmpt has terrible kd iirc. bad vehicle, need buff right?)
No one says the T-80BVM is trash, or the Pantsir SV, or Kh-38 or LMUR or the BMP-T…or the Su-27 and Su-30…all trash
so russian government is not russian if bunch of losers in eng section are only ones that pray on these vehicles. or idk putin is your personal idol or something
And of course you use manipulation over data. I am not surprised
BMP-T isnt a tank compare it to IFV kills and oh damn look at that 1.10 kills per spawn…
You sure do spend a lot of time defending these underperforming vehicles
You not liking the data is on you.
I took last months data the most recent and that is the results. Now I expect a spike in players moving trees to grind the new M1 or even the T-90M but the pattern will settle and I fully expect Russia to maintain its win rate. Further enhancements to the current Russian tanks will cement that.
You think I don’t know data? Recently I analysed all popular Abrams from 10.7 to 12.7 and their russian counter parts
And I know that out of two Russian 12.7 tanks: one better performing and second worse performing you choose better one
But at the same time out three abrams you chose the WORST PERFORMING.
How so? Make it fair and show stats of better performing Abrams. Or it doesn’t fit your agenda?
Russia always wants to appear as strong, war thunder has a massive Russian player base.
Russians do not appear strong when 1000s of their tanks are being destroyed, ammunition detonating and turrets popping.
But on War thunder well reality can be what you want it to be.
I would bet if you put a poll up and asked which tank would you rather go to war in a
T-90M or a Challenger 2 people would choose the T-90M because in War thunder the CR2 it is crap, it has a weaker gun a weaker round, less armour is not mobile enough.
Reality is the T-90M while has good armour is uncomfortable, you need to leave the tank to go to the toilet you cannot access the bustle from inside the tank, it’s FCS is dated by Western standards as are the optics and if you have to spend a day in one you are totally exhausted. This is with me not even considering a penetrating round will likely detonate the carousell.
Russia are convincing the next generation that Russian kit is equal and superior to NATO it is soft power projection.
Don’t talk to him, he’s a troll, he’s at a beginner level and has only played on rank one vehicles. He wants to provoke you into insults.
UwU, get better
Ok, Thanks. Take care too.
I chose the best one because people keep saying Russia has the worst or one of the worst top tier tanks.
Its also important to remember we are looking at May and a tank that has been spawned a million times should see a drop off unless it is very good.
Global stats below -
74 million times a T-80BVM has been spawned has a 1.19 kill per spawn
T-90M 36 million 1.08 kill per spawn.
Black Night comparatively 5.1 million spawns 1.11 kills per spawn.
M1A2 Sep comes closer with 19 million and 1.04
Leo 2A7 regarded as the best tank in the game.
44 million spawns and 1.35 kills per spawn
I have been fair in the data. Leopard 2A7 overall is the better tank.
M1A2T - 2 million spawns and 1.33 kills per spawn… soo either the US players are bad, or the M1A2 is better performing then the T-80BVM…
I already talked about this like 3 month-ish ago
Who didn’t spawn BVM first to gain map control?
That’s basic pattern you see in a match.

Where did you see 2 million “spawns” here?
When there are more than a million battles played on it, then we can talk.
Otherwise, if we follow your logic, the Merkava is basically an OP.

Global stats are at 2.3 million games. Which is also stupid of him to mention, because the US Abrams are at 16 and 19 million respectively.

ok.
dislike given
